9o 
et Dr 3 
0.01151087 = — 
24.09008 * * ‘ ( 3S * 6 ) 
— - . i . < 
Simili omnino ratione ipsum ctiaiii B liceret niiiiîo æ- 
qualem statuere, atque sic quidem prodiret 
A == 
n 
1 — |- n 
et 
D = — 
nur 
2(1 -j- ni) 
% • 
ni n 3 (2 m — l) 
-L 
T 
6 1 
\ 
m 
ideoque pro hypothesi y (o) ~ i , 
At = 0.8221413 
1 
1.21C330 ’ 
, (39. î) 
• • • • 
( 39 . 2 ) 
(39. 3) 
(39. 1) 
et 
Cr 2 =2— 0. 1202177 “ — 
Dr 3 = — 0.002212357 =— 
8.318244 
1 
452.0068 
(39. 5) 
(39. 6) 
Tandem, si ipsum D pro evanescente habeamus, liet 
per demonstrata in antecedentibus 
5 3 — 
3 m n 2 B (2 m — 1 )» 3 m 
(1 4“ ib) 3 (t + niy 
ideoque in hypothesi ^( 0 ) 1 , 
(BtY — 0.7213059 (5r) — 0.01327414 = 0 
0 
