446 
Fishery Bulletin 115(4) 
0 
nP 
0 s 
00 
C\J 
< 
O 
A 
°®D <P < 
•• 
> f # « 
• • 
0 % 
^ 0 
• 
-1 ( 
) i 
B 
A S. chrysops 
* 
A V r? 
V M. aeg/efinus 
0 V s. acanthias 
* 
• RIMA-MA 
0 NY 
□ NJ 
Leucoraja^—7 
C. harengus A> ^ 
M> Atosa 
-2 
-1 
C. stnata chrysops 
H. obtonga V * Vy Hem/(rjp/ 
S. acanthus P dentatus\J V* 
Pelagic fish 
V Demersal fish 
-1 
2 O Crustacea 
+ Mollusca 
v U. regia 0 Merostomata 
" chrysop 
Hemitripterus am. 
0 
0 V 
L. potyphemus 
Leucoraja 
P. 
iucoraja ^ 
, *.? D £7” z amencanus 
’ amer/canus*' v L. 
„ M. octodecemspinosus 
Z american"<* 
ferruginea 
-2 
-1 
0 
CA1 (20.7%) 
Figure S 
(A) Correspondence analysis ordination plots, showing the scores and variance 
explained for the first and second dimensions (CA1 and CA2), of the sampling 
stations at 3 wind energy areas, Rhode Island-Massachusetts and Massachusetts 
(RIMA-MA), New York (NY), and New Jersey (NJ), by using fish and macro-inver¬ 
tebrate taxa that occurred in at least 10% of the collections made with a bottom 
trawl in 2014. The size of the symbols are scaled to the contribution of each taxon 
to the ordination and are shown by taxon classification for (B) average proportion 
of a taxon per station and (C) average individual weight of a taxon per station. 
Taxa that contributed more than 3% to the ordination are labeled (For names of 
taxa, see Table 3). 
