80 FLORIDA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY-TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT 
6. Eustis, Lake County, samples from 100-180 feet. 
7. Bushnell, Sumter County, samples from 380-3,080 feet. 
8. Apopka, Orange County, samples from 50-390 feet. 
9. Sanford, Seminole County, samples from 95-113 feet. 
10. Cocoa, Brevard County, a sample from 190 feet. 
11. Tiger Bay, Polk County, 770 feet. 
12. Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, samples to 500 feet. 
13. Boca Grande, Lee County. 
14. Fort Myers, Lee County, 950 feet. 
15. Marathon, Monroe County, 2,300 feet. 
The well at Boca Grande was represented by a single, sample 
that gives no definite information and is not further considered. 
Of the others, some are represented by but very few samples, 
others by samples of indefinite range, and others by very full de¬ 
tailed specimens. Thus the relative value is very different and 
each is considered separately. For convenience of reference the 
information is-.given in the order as indicated above. A brief sum¬ 
mary of the probable stratigraphy is given with each well and the 
whole summarized in a general account later. 
I wish to express my thanks to Drs. T. Wayland Vaughan, T. 
W. Stanton and C. W. Cooke for reading parts of the present pa¬ 
per and for helpful suggestions. Also I wish to thank the State 
Geologist, Dr. E. H. Sellards, for his interest in the work and his 
courtesy in obtaining needed information. 
WELL AT PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA. 
Depth of well 470 feet. Samples are few and represent wide 
ranges and therefore are very unsatisfactory for detailed work. 
30-60 feet. No foraminifera. 
60-100 feet. Foraminifera very rare and poor. 
100-200 feet. Foraminifera very rare and poor. 
200-300 feet. Foraminifera small, numerous. 
300-400 feet. Foraminifera few and poor. 
400-470 feet. Represented by a single large specimen with casts of mollusca 
and Nummulites (?) indicating Eocene. 
There is little use in trying to determine the stratigraphy from 
such poor data. There is a specimen of white hard material 
