467 
— 36, Stromfelt also includes under the single species Fucus 
evanescens Ag. everything mentioned by Kjellman in his N. I. 
under this name, and everything reported from Norway under 
the names of F. edentatns and F. furcatus, and lastly de la Pylaie’s 
Fig. 90. Fucus inflatus L. f. edcntata de la Pyl. From Thorshavn. 3 / 5 : 1. (H. Westergaard del.) 
F. edentatus; uniting these species, because J. Agardli told him 
that some of his forms from Iceland bore a close resemblance to 
the original specimens of de la Pylaie’s F. edentatus, and I think he 
is quite justified in doing so. But I do not agree with Stromfelt 
when he insists that what Kjellman in N. I. calls Fucus edentatus, 
for which, as mentioned above, the type is No. 401 in Areschoug’s 
Exsicc., is not identical with de la Pylaie’s Fucus edentatus; nor 
Botany of the Faeroes. 
30 
