72 
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters. 
VII 
I have reserved for separate consideration two texts which are 
directly related to versions examined above, but which raise special 
questions. 
The first of these texts is associated with Einsiedeln i * 1 
AD PROPHETAS 
Prophete venientes admonent: 2 3 4 <p. 54> 
Gloriosi 
Et famosl 
Regis festum 
Celebrantes 
Gaudeamus; 
Cuius ortum 
Uite portum 
Nobis datum 
Predicantes 
Habeamus. 
1 Einsiedeln Ms. 366 (olim 179), Fragmenta liturgica ssec. xi-xii, pp. 53-54. 
The manuscript is described by P. G. Meier, Catalogus Codicum manu scriptorum 
qui in Bibliotheca Monasterii Einsidlensis O. S. B. servantur, Vol. I, Einsiedeln— 
Leipzig, 1899, pp. 331-332. The part of the manuscript containing liturgico- 
dramatic pieces (pp. 53-56) is more carefully described by W. Meyer, Frag¬ 
menta Burana, Berlin, 1901, pp. 51—52. I base my own text and observations 
upon the manuscript itself. The liturgico-dramatic pieces are found as follows: 
(1) p. 53 (beginning on the first line and ending on the next to the last line) : 
a fragment of the Officium Stellce. For bibliography see a note of the present 
writer in University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature, No. 4, 
Madison, 1919, p. 7, note 19. In this note I neglected to mention the fact that 
this fragment is printed also by A. Schubiger, in Musikalische Spicilegien, Jahr- 
gang IV, Lieferung II, Berlin, 1876, pp. 44-46. 
(2) pp. 53 (last line)-5 4 (last line) : a fragment of the Or do Prophet arum , 
published by F. J. Mone, Schauspiele des Mittelalters, Vol. I, Karlsruhe, 1846, 
pp. 10-12, and by Schubiger, op. cit., pp. 46-47 ; and republished herewith, with 
collation of the texts of Mone and Schubiger. 
(3) p. 55 (first three lines) : a fragment (latter part) of the prose Hortum 
prcedestinatio, published by Mone, p. 12, and republished below, p. 74. 
(4) pp. 55 (line 3)-56 (line 5) : a version the Visitatio Sepulchri, headed by 
the rubric In Resurrectione; published by Mone, pp. 12—13. See below, p. 74. 
Since there is obviously no continuity between the last words on p. 54 and 
the first words on p. 55 (See below, note 12) it is clear that one or more leaves 
have been lost between (2) and (3). The lost part must have contained a 
continuation of the Ordo Prophetarum and the beginning of the Hortum prce¬ 
destinatio. For further discussion of this lacuna in the manuscript see below, 
pp. 76—77, and Meyer, pp. 51—52. 
2 Ad Prophetas. Prophete venientes admonent] Omitted (Mone). 
