358 Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts , and Letters. 
PAGE 
Its Structure. 425 
Its Operation on the Hearer’s Mind. .. 426 
Its Expression by a Sentence. 429 
The Specially Question-Asking Word. 432 
Its meaning ... 432 
Precedents for bulky meaning . 441 
Its rank . 441 
CHAPTER IV. 
THE JUDGMENT INTERROGATIVE AS TO BELIEF. 
Its Elements. 
The missing element—belief . 445 
The desideratum — belief-or-disbelief . 447 
Description of desideratum . 449 
Assertion of description . 450 
Desire to be told desideratum . 450 
Assertion of desire ... 450 
Truth instead of untruth — and vice versa . 450 
Its Peculiarities. 
Fails to distinguish belief-or-disbelief as meum or tuum..... 452 
Expects answer in terms of belief only . 453 
Its Structure . 454 
Its Operation on the Hearer’s Mind . 458 
Its Expression by a Sentence . 458 
The Specially Question-Asking Word .i. 464 
Its meaning . 467 
Its rank . 468 
In the following pages I several times refer to my articles—here cited 
once for all completely—on 
“The Meaning and Function of Thought Connectives”—published in 
the “Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Let¬ 
ters,” Vol. XII, pp. 1-48, and 
“A Revision of the Pronoun, with Special Examination of Relatives 
and Relative Clauses,” 1. c. Vol. XIII, pp. 1-140. 
