Mouographia Tiliae geueris. 
41 
A B* C D* E F* G* H I 
1. T. Tucekii Op iz in sclied. ! — Folia parva, raro basi emarginata; 
cyma 3-pauciflora, folio brevior; bracteae omnes evidenter petiolatae. Corona 
dense-foliata. — In Bohemia ! Vindobonae ! 
A B* C D* E F* G*' H* I 
1. T. rubra DC. Catal. horti monsp. p. 150. Prodrom. I. p. 513. _ 
Folia magna, raso basi emarginata, supra pubescentia, subtus hirta ; cyma 
multiflora dimidiam laminam aequans; bracteae latae, folio breviores, rarius 
cyma breviores ; Stylus basi saepe subglaber; nux magna, piriformis, basi 
truncata, acute-costata. Corona laxa , opaco-viridis, multiflora. — In horto 
botan. Vindob. ! 
Nux magna, oviformis aut oboviformis, basi non truncata, villoso- 
tomentosa. — In horto Petropol.! in Bohemia! 
A B* C D* E* F* G H I 
1. Folia parva, oblique elliptica rotundata nec apiculata, basi rarissime 
emarginata, subtus subhirta; cyma pauciflora; bracteae latissimae, evidenter 
petiolatae. Kami dense-foliati. — In Silesia inferiore culta sub nomine T. 
pauciflora Hayne var. glabral 
A B* C* D* E F* G* H* I 
1. T. grandifolia Ehrh. var. lacmiata Mill. — T. asplenifolia 
Hortul. Folia diversiformia, lacerata, vel lobata, dentata, serrata, basi 
raro emarginata; formam cordatam minime referentia; cyma 3-pauciflora 
bracteae cymam saepe vix superantes; Stylus basi saepius glaber. Corona 
multiflora. Culta Petropoli! Vindobonae! in Bohemia! et alibi! 
A*BCDEFGHI 
1. T. pyramidalis Host 1. c . p. 61. — Rchb. 1. c. t. 323. f. 5148. 
— Folia mediocria, serrulata, nitida; cyma multiflora, folio brevior, pedi- 
celli saepe bracteolis lanceolatis curvatis, persistentibus ornati; bracteae an- 
gustae, basin versus angustatae, cymam aequantes ; nux oboviformis. Corona 
conica, dense-foliata, lucide-viridis , multiflora. — In horto botanico Vindob.! 
et alibi ! 
2. T. intermedia Ilost 1. c. p. 61. — Diflert a priori pedicellis non 
bracteolatis, bracteis oblongis, stylo nonnunquam basi barbato ; corona laxa, 
obscure-viridi. - In horto bot. Vind.! et alibi! 
Icon in Franz Schmidt, Oesterr. Baumzucht IV. t. 223. huic arbori 
non est similis ! 
Bi XII. Abhandl. 
6 
