( 36 ) 
In this A E=Eii q M — Stolid■ As now in general: 
£=[(l-0)(«,). + 20 («,).] + 1(1-0) *,+20*,] T-j + f., 
in other words (as — («,), + 2 (e,)„ = q„ and *,+2*, = yR): 
E = [(«,). + 09,] + (1.+0V-K) T - ^ + pv, 
we - have (the index 2 refers to the liquid phase): 
LE = (0,-0.) (q.+yRT) -(^-0 + p («,-»,) • 
In this v , — v x = A V, hence we get generally: 
LE = (0,-0,) (q.+yRT) + (p + A V. . . . (12) 
Now for T=0 we have p=p 0 == - AF= 2 b t — b^bb, 
so that only remains : 
(T = 0) LE — yRT . ( 12# ). 
So finally we get for T= 0: 
(1 T = 0) f= -J 10 ' - = - • ■ • (l 3 ) 
1 * \dTj 0 — T (—Lb) -A6 
So also this limiting value is finite, so that for T= 0 the line 
SM meets the vertical axis T= 0 at a finite pressure and a finite 
angle. With our values = — TJ = “ 6 * 
It follows from (10) that p 0 is positive only when q 0 > ^ 
If q t is precisely equal to this value, then p„ = 0; and if ?. * s 
less than this value, p 0 would become negative, which is impossi 
In our example the limiting value meant is 2700. ^ 
It is self-evident that in this A6 must always be negative. ^ 
otherwise the line SM does not run to the left, but to the ng 
coexistence solid-liquid is not found below the triple-point tempera 
but is found at higher temperatures. 
9. In connection with the foregoing considerations it h^someh^ 
been asked why the new phase, the existence of whic ^ 
consequence of the renewed bent of the isotherms m ^ 
bourhood of v=b on the assumption of association, ^ 
differs from zero — is undeniable, would have to be a J 
Can it not be a second liquid phase, so that a “longitu a 
occui*s with corresponding imperfect miscibility of two 1( i u 
