Dihes near Kennebunkport^ Maine. — Kemp. 
139 
ten bay ; G, F. Richards,'^ in South Carolina ; and the writer 
in certain undescribed specimens from the Adirondacks. It 
seems as if Archaean dikes especially favored this mineralogi- 
cal aggregate. 
TABULATION OP DIKES. 
No 
. on 
No 
.on 
Map. 
Width. Character. 
Map 
Width 
Character. 
2. 
2' 
Granite. 
50. 
1' 
Melapbyre. 
5. 
i' 
Not determined. 
51. 
3' 
Olivine-diabase. 
8. 
— 
Olivine-diabase. 
52. 
21 
ranclie 
s. 
9. 
1' 
Granite. 
6' 
and 20' Porphyritic, Not 
10. 
18" 
Melapbyre. 
determined. 
11. 
10 
-15' 
Olivine-diabase, 
54. 
10' 
Not determined. 
Hobbs. 
55. 
7' 
-10' 
Olivine-diabase, 
12. 
1 
- 2' 
Melapbyre. 
Hobbs. 
13. 
— 
Olivine-diabase. 
5(). 
20' 
(( li 
14. 
— 
Inchided schist. 
Type-Hobbs. 
15. 
4' 
Olivine-diabase. 
60. 
10 
-12' 
Olivine-diabase, 
17. 
2' 
- 4' 
a a 
Hobbs. 
18. 
18" 
Not determined. 
61. 
2' 
Olivine-diabase. 
19. 
4' 
Olivine-diabase. 
62. 
6' 
Not determined. 
21. 
2' 
( ( (( 
63. 
6' 
Olivine-diabase, 
22. 
2' 
" Hobbs. 
Hobbs. 
23. 
2' 
(( ( ( 
64. 
2' 
- 4' 
Not determined. 
24. 
2' 
U i i 
66. 
1' 
Melapbyre. 
25. 
3' 
Camptonite. 
67. 
30' 
Olivine-diabas . 
26. 
8' 
-10' 
01ivine:-diabase. 
68. 
6 
- 8' 
Not determine . 
28. 
— 
Granite. 
75. 
12 
-15' 
Olivine-diaba. 
30. 
8' 
Olivine-diabase. 
76. 
1 
- i> 
a li 
32. 
Narrow. 
Melapbyre. 
77. 
2 
- 3' 
ti li 
33. 
" 
Not on map— Augite- 
78. 
15" 
li li 
porphyrite. 
79. 
1 
-18' 
Melapbyre. 
34. 
10' 
-12' 
Olivine-diabase, 
80. 
6' 
Olivine-diabase. 
Hobbs. 
81 
— 
"Hobbs. 
35. 
8' 
ii a 
82. 
3 
- 4' 
" " 
38. 
5' 
Not determined. 
83. 
5' 
( < li 
39. 
4' 
( ( ii 
84. 
1' 
-4' 
INIelaphyre. 
41. 
3' 
a a 
86. 
1 
- 2' 
Olivine-diabase. 
43. 
4' 
a li 
87. 
2' 
- 3' 
a 11 
44. 
10' 
11 11 
88. 
1' 
Melapbyre. 
45. 
1' 
( . a 
89. 
1' 
Olivine-diabase. 
4G. 
6' 
- 8' 
li it 
90. 
5' 
Augite-porphyrite. 
48. 
8' 
-10' 
Olivine-diabase. 
91. 
20' 
Olivine-diabase. 
Type-Hobbs. 
92. 
40' 
Augite-porph 
49. 
3' 
Not determined. 
In the case of the Kennebunkport dikes, it is very remark- 
able that nowhere any very great parent mass shows itself, for 
we would naturally regard these narrow dikes as simple ofi- 
shoots from some large body at no great distance, which have 
^Haworth, Amer. Geologist, Mav, June, 1888. 
^Hobbs, Bull. Mns. Comp. Zool. Vol. XVI, No. 1. 
^Lawson, Proc. Can. Inst. Apr. 1888. 
derrick, Tight, and .lones, Bull. Denison Univ. Vol. II p. 119. 
•"•Richards idem. Vol. IV, p. 5. 
