New Bryozoa from Nebraska. — Condra. 359 
Thamniscus sevillensis Ulrich. 
[0. Reverse face of a diffuse form. 
PLATE XXV. 
Cystodictya anisopora n. sp. 
1. Outline of specimen, natural size. 
2. Enlarged branch. 
3. Transverse section of a branch. 
4. Vertical section. 
=5. Oblique tangential section. 
Cystodictya lophodes n. sp. 
6. Outline of specimen, natural size. 
7. Enlarged branch. 
THE CINCINNATI ANTICLINE IN SOUTHERN 
KENTUCKY. 
By Aug. F. Foerste, Dayton, O. 
PLATE XXVI. 
CONTENTS. 
A. The Cincinnati anticline. 
Its trend 359 
Its existence in early Devonian times 359 
B. The Silurian east of the anticline in southern Kentucky. 
Fishing creek; Forbush creek; Little Cub creek 361 
C. The southern extension of the Devonian along the anticline. 
Devonian limestone 362 
Louisville; southern Ohio; along the crest of the antic- 
line; along the western flank at Pegram in Tennessee; 
along the eastern flank on Fishing creek in Kentucky 
Nevr Albany or Chattanooga Black shale 364 
D. The Ordovician east of the anticline in Kentucky. 
Richmond formation 364 
Fishing creek; Forbush creek; Little Cub creek 364 
Lorraine formation 365 
Cumberland sandstone 367 
The Fowler limestone 368 
Rocks in central Kentucky identified with the Cumber- 
land sandstone 368 
E. The Saluda or Madison bed ol Indiana and western Kentucky 
A. The Cincinnati Anticline. 
Its trend. — The Cincinnati anticline is a low fold extending 
from southwestern Ohio through central Kentucky and Ten- 
nessee. Its general trend is about 25 degrees west of south. 
In Ohio its crest passes about 15 miles east of Cincinnati; in 
Tennessee, about 40 miles east of Nashville. 
hs existence in early Devonian times. — The fold originated 
during the Paleozoic era. Some geologists feel convinced that 
evidence of its existence can be detected even in earlv Ordo- 
