-Ik, 1967 
r) 
Finch 
Observation distances 
from line 
of 
transects 
Di 
stance 
recorded in 
* 
feet; 
each 
distance 
recorded is for one bird a 
piece 
s * 
V-y 
30 
10 
20 
2 
30 
3 • 
6 
3 
10 
25 
10 
; 
S 
3 
30 
20 
15 
0 . 
10 
6 
15 
25 
40 
r\ rf 
25 
4o 
3 
15 
2 
0 
0 
0 
10 
* t 
30 
So 
70 - 
30 
0 
5 
2 
0 
1 
0 
3 
3 
100 
100 
20 
4 
20 -* 
•5 
4 
3 
15 
6 . 
4o 
2 
0 
40 
30 
10 
30 
0 
5 
30 
0 
0 
0 
12 
2 
20 
2 
30 
2 
20 
0 
8 
22 
8 
3 
0 
0 
50 
25 
100 
20 
20 
10 
20 
3 
15 
7 
6 
3 
0 
50 
22 
10 ■ 
40 
• 5 
30 
0 
20 
35 
12 
0 
0 
8 
4 
30 
3 
5 
10 
15 
2 
0 
6 
12 
: 2his was a total of 120 birds observed. The total flushing distance was 
- V ‘ . 4 
•> 
1,825 feet for an average of 50.21 feet' flushing distance. 
p.5 
walker, Ballou data : vest one-half of island. Start 1210 hours, stop 
1700 hours. 
0* 
f 
O 
riSl 
1 (2) 
25 
3 (2) 
8 
2 (2) 
8 
2 (2) 
10 
50 
1 
12 
8 
10 
10 
(2) 7 
25 
- 
0 
8 (12) 11 
6 (2) 
10 
12 
3 
2 
20 
- 
2 
9 
1 
11 
6 
0 
6 (2) 
0 
- 
r 
O 
4 
8 (2) 
10 
3 (3) 
.8 
6 
0 
1 
- 
O 
10 
5 
12 
7 
0 
15 
(2) 10 
0 
- 
2 
8 
50 
4 (2) 
10 
0 
20 
1 (3) 
8 
- 
2 
2 
12 
10 (2) 
0 
20 (2) 8 
12 
20 
2 
O 
8 (M 
9 (2) 
8 
3 (5) 
20 
8 
30 
- 
4 
> 
10 (5) 
6 
1 
10 (3) 12 
0 
4o 
- 
It was decided that for both the Miller bird and the Finch it would be 
far more reliable because of the secretive habits of the Miller bird as 
veil as the thickness of the vegetation in certain areas which would 
/ ! 
conceal some of the finches it Would be much better to use a transect 
method of one rod wide/which would then get a useable observation distance 
/ . „ / 1 ' 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
