132 
REVIEW. 
rantly as to impair his health or injure his system ? This would probably become a 
question whether the defendant had given mercury, and that in the result would^practically 
tiTor e thp e d lf pf a g r dea + mt ° t^s—whether the i UI 7 believed the evidence fo/the plaim 
treatment yfth m?*' ° De appear f ^ would be made a question whether 
not w Tk! wafn^ WaS f . pro ?f or “°> but it was at length admitted that it was 
t so. -there was no question, then, that mercurial treatment was improper and the 
Sotr W w“ ' Vhether S* TA ire ? by the defend “ t That quSn’iavobed 
several others. Was the man salivated ? If s0 , how ? Was it by blue pills ’ If so 
salivation fndhv J* ^11 be doubted tbat th e man had suffered under 
+1 ,!? 0n and 7 reason of blue pills. Where did they come from’ Was it nrobablo 
th cm ilamtiff*vvas^ 0 ? & °T ^ Che “ ist ’ and that while getting medicine from one shop 
here to 1 com ini f S a °°^b er ^op and getting mercurial medicine, and then came 
defendant ’ IW W * ^ ^ Wll f, ul perjury b ^ swe aring that he had it from 
more probable that? We ! aS a m0St wicked man would so act. It was 
If the iurv beliovorl tbo r ? bee ?, Some mistake hi the defendant’s shop, 
the defendant ho d 0 plaint + f’ the blue pills came from that shop. If they believed 
from by some mfstnl p °,l ^ them ’ but StiU tbe ^ mi g ht have eome Pre¬ 
clusion of wd» d j hlS WaS the onl J suggestion he could make to avoid the con-* 
JT Ol Wilful perjury and conspiracy on one side or the other. The great point wa« 
j l iey were satisfied that the defendant administered the mercury to the plaintiff* 
such da C C es "r r ti0n he and ? f s0 ’ the - y should p™ such damages M(i 
(j an t. tg 0Se out of tbe mjuries caused by the negligence of the defen- 
TOHnawPPk 0 !^ ?tt 7 g avea verdict for the plaintiff,-damages £ 100 . 
1n • ; a week of the trial the man died, and at the inquest held on the body the fol 
\oZ7Z Ct ™-f tarned: -“ We find that the deceased, Henry Fitzroy^^ Jones was 
^ysLa of g one of J C b ^ ^ * he “ ortal effects of an attack of bronchitis, with’em- 
A £ ? the luDgS ’ and a dlseased state of the heart, and other diseased con 
fur ' her + S X that the said dea tb of the said decea^d was^he 
t of natural causes, accelerated by a weakness produced by excessive salivation.” 
xtJbJVIE W. 
T Kep B oZ of the RF Cv S ,V Z Member of the Society of Arts, and 
illustrations bv Bourihn ‘tv, Great } 5xhl T blt,0 , n perfumery Class). With above 250 
1865. 7 delin, Thomas, etc. London: Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. 
lowing exi e ract a fromTh P e e p f f the au ,, thorof ‘Ms volume will be best learned by the fol- 
of odLs in general 1 t fcTlL Jiff “ f Af Mr devoting a few pages to the physiology 
times to the pfesent neriod end ? 7 ° P e V u ™fs «od cosmetics from the earliest 
desrrihp Hip h • P od, and that is the principal feature of my work. I then brieflv 
S the nr r “f ar0maS f ™ m P Ia " fa aad “ 
in fine I frivp alltZ?rf / 7 f + * he P rnc }P ? 1 Jmgrant materials used in our manufacture • 
whlcbd think likely to interest the general reader” ’ 
The author gives no moderaformnl "h ™* th / ir c l uaintness are likely to amuse.” 
better and cheaper from dealers than -, ecau5 j e 1 P e Humery can always be bought much 
T-n” t r d 1" °‘ her reaSMS > -Mch are g°”ven in “facT" Pri '’ ate ' y * 
used in Perfumery 6 ” are 1 those from m ^l^h I GS6S of . Flowers a “d Piants ’’and “Materials 
all will be found interesting Z m . wI ? lch ( our re ^ers will derive most advantage, but 
these are not important. '^The work^i^-n 6 few errors we have noticed, but 
well printed, etc.,—in fact suited for fb^/ U -^ 1 u strated, deliciously perfumed, and 
ful purposes. ’ ted for the d r a wmg-room table as well as for more use- 
useful to^uT^adere^— r ° m aPP6DdiX ’ althou ^ h free errors, will be found 
