October 22, 1870.] THE PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL AND TRANSACTIONS. 
329 
( Forsbrook, William Henry .. Birmingham. 
Grove, Harry Nicholas .Walsall. 
Roberts, David Prosser .Hereford. 
Hambridge, Thomas .Tottenham. 
^ ( Bake, Alfred Benjamin .Guildford. 
|} Christie, James.Aberdeen. 
w ( Avison, David .Wakefield. 
! Bristow, Charles Robert.Ryde, Isle of Wight. 
Lund, Richard John .Leeds. 
Severs, Samuel Thomas.Leeds. 
Wheeler, William Henry .... Bristol. 
Woolldridge, George .Birmingham. 
Haworth, Edwin.Oswaldtwistlo. 
Gould, Henry Thomas .Newport, I. W. 
Broadbent, Sidney .Saddlcworth. 
f Boulton, Henry Hamer .London. 
Bunn, Charles Grinling.Colchester. 
Hethcrington, Martin Luther . Highbury. 
Howard, George .Havant. 
T0 
a * 
cc 
3 
cr 
& 
c* 
-W 
Hodgson, Alfred .York. 
}{ 
§ / 
-w 
Jameson, William Edward ... .Bristol. 
Mills, Robert.London. 
Urwin, James Alexander .... Harton. 
Pott, Frederick Fore .London. 
Clarke, Thomas Edward.Shrewsbury. 
Hargreaves, Joseph.Liverpool. 
•3 | Holgate, Sam .York. 
J* 1 Harry, Seth .Gravesend. 
/ Kirkwood, Daniel.Beith. 
Bumpstead, Robert George... .Colchester. 
Fox, William.Grantham. 
Harrison, William Hopper.... Barnstaple. 
Husband, John Cecil .Berwick-on-Tweed. 
Jeffery, Henry Thomas .Tring. 
Macdonald, George Edward .. Ashton-under-Lyne. 
Smith, Arthur John.London. 
Stephan, William Henry .... Chipping Norton. 
Stubbs, Edwin.Hull. 
Thompson, Lawrence Joseph. .Thirsk. 
Walbran, Francis Maxwell.. . .Leeds. 
The Certificates of Examination of the following by 
other bodies were accepted in lieu of the Society’s Pre¬ 
liminary Examination :— 
Birch, Charles .Chesterfield. 
Cogman, Charles.London. 
Lansdalc, John Anstey .High Wycombe. 
Overton, Charles Arthur.Horncastle. 
Utting, Charles Edward.Diss. 
Walton, Thomas .Bishopwcarmouth. 
Webb, Herbert Charles .London. 
The Questions for Examination were as follows. 
Time allowed: Three Hours. 
LATIN. 
Translate into English two or more of the following sen¬ 
tences :— 
1. Ita dies circiter quindecim iter fecerunt, uti, 
inter novissimum hostium agmen ct nostrum primum, 
non amplius quinis aut senis millibus passuum in- 
teresset. 
2. Quos quum apud se in castris Ariovistus con- 
spexisset, exercitu suo praisente, conclamavit: Quid 
ad se venirent F an speculandi causa F Conantes di- 
cere prohibuit, et in catenas conjecit. 
3. Liquorem ammonia? spii'itu miscc: turn ex ro- 
torta vitrea, lento igne, destillet octarius; denique in 
hoc liqua camphoram. 
4. Optime terantur simul, dein in pulvercs octo 
mquales dividentur, quorum capiat aeger unurn omni 
hora? quadrante, donee adsit catharsis. 
5. Decline cyathus vinarius. 
6. State the superlatives of bom:-s, multus and nc- 
qnam. 
7. Give the accusative endings of the five declen¬ 
sions. 
8. Give the third persons singular and plural, indi¬ 
cative mood, present tense of capio, sumo , adhibeo and 
coy i to. 
■9. How does the relative agree with the antecedent F 
Give an example in Latin. 
ARITHMETIC. 
10. A cow and a calf were worth £16. 7s. 10|c/.: 
the calf alone was worth £2. 6s. 7what was the 
value of the cow F 
11. A wall 28 feet in height was built in 15 days by 
68 men; how many men working at the same rate 
could build a wall 32 feet high in 8 days P 
12. Reduce ykVV to its lowest terms. 
13. Multiply 3§ by 4^-. 
14. Divide 207T5975 by 1-25. 
ENGLISH. 
15. Name the relative pronouns; why are they so 
called ? 
16. Give the masculine nouns corresponding to 
duchess, heifer, witch and roe, and the feminine to 
beau, lord, master and executor. 
17. How are the comparative and superlative de¬ 
grees formed F Give examples, and state what change 
takes place in dissyllables in y. 
18. What is meant by a neuter verb F and write 
down a sentence containing one. 
19. Parse the following:—The Imperial troops took 
possession of the bridge. 
20. Write from 15 to 25 lines upon one only of the 
following subjects :— 
a. War and the consequences thereof. 
b. Steam, its advantages and disadvantages. 
e. The holiday trip. 
EXAMINATION IN EDINBURGPI. 
October 11th , 1870. 
Present—Messrs. Aitken, Baildon, Brown, Buchanan, 
Kemp, and Young. 
Twenty-two Candidates were examined—two Major, 
six Minor, nine Modified, and five Preliminary ; the fol¬ 
lowing passed: — 
MAJOR (registered as Pharmaceutical Chemists). 
Paton, James..Edinburgh. 
Robinson, Janies .Darlington. 
MINOR (registered as Chemists and Druggists). 
*Oscroft, James.Salford. 
Brewis, Thomas .Rothbury. 
Elder, William Nind .Pultency Town. 
Straehan, Alexander .Aberdeen. 
MODIFIED (registered as Chemists and Druggists). 
Cant, David .Forfar. 
Clarke, Joseph Adam.Glasgow. 
Clarkson, Thomas .Hartlepool. 
Coates, Joseph.Newcastle. 
Purdic, James .Glasgow. 
Sibthorp, Stephen James Ken¬ 
neth .. Glasgow. 
Tocher, George.Portobello. 
PRELIMINARY (registered as Apprentices or 
Students). 
Attwood, Henry Ernest.Edinburgh. 
Forewell, Henry.Edinburgh. 
Linklater, James.Edinburgh. 
M‘Glashan, Alexander .Perth. 
Erratum. —Page 309, col. 2, linos 13 and 14, 
for Martin, John.Seacombe. 
Miller, William Henry ... .Ridgeway. 
read 
Martin, John.Ridge w a). 
Miller, William Henry-Seacombe. 
* Passed with honours. 
