difeover‘’d in other AlTertions j oit?ers^ 
offthe contraryjwillby no means be con¬ 
fined to hold only thofe things for true, 
which no Man of lound reafon and good 
fenfc Will disbelievej but they efteem alf 
thole things true, which to them appear 
toi be pretty and ingenious. Yea, the 
ratrons of Experience themfelves have 
feidom' obferved that moderation, but 
have either rejeded even the moft cer¬ 
tain Principles of Nature, or have held 
the Principles invented by themfelves' 
for demonftrated. Therefore to avoid 
this Rock alfo, I have deemed fit to 
urge that in Phjficks^ what Sensed hath 
often inculcated in Morals 5 where he af¬ 
firms thole Precepts of to be the 
beft, which are common to all, publiCk, 
and agreed unto by all of all the Families 
oiV‘\\i\ol^o^)\cx%^feri^atetick$HAcademkks 
-Stoicks^ Cjnicks. And indeed, me thinks, 
that thofe Principles of Nature cannot 
but be beft,which are common,and pub- 
lick, and acknowledged by all Schoolesg 
as well by thofe, that are Lovers of No¬ 
velty^ as thofe that are addided to An^ 
tiquity. 
Wherefo/e I determine not. Whether 
