June, 1899. 
WAYSIDE NOTES. 
148 
* R. rhamnifolius, 27. (R. cordifolius , 2nd Edit. 57, 3rd Edit. 74.) 
R. discolor, 27. 
R. fruticosus, 27. (R. argenteus , 2nd Edit. 56, 3rd Edit. 73. Probably 
the same as R. discolor. See Babington, “British Rubi," p. 160.) 
* R. leucostachys, 27. 
R. carpinifolius, 27. 
R. villicaulis, 27. 
R. pallidus, 27. Prof. Babington refers this to R. Hystrix. See “ British 
ltubi,” p. 173. Mr. Lees's plant is not the R. pallidus of the Rubi 
germanici. 
R. rudis, 27. 
R. Radula, 27. 
* R. Koehleri, 27. 
R. echinatus, 27. A form of the last. See 3rd Edit.,p. 70, Babington's 
“ British Rubi," p. 209. 
I R. fuscus, 27. ( Professor Babington refers this to Rubus glandulosus, 
var. hirtus ; “ British Rubi," p. 250. The localities are in Here¬ 
fordshire; see 2nd Edit., p. 52; 3rd Edit., p. 69.) 
R. fusco-ater, 27. 
R. diversifolius, 27. Not in the 2nd or 3rd Editions. 
R. dumetorum, 27. This I believe to be R. diversifolius of modern 
authors. 
R. corylifolius, 27. 
R. Schleicheri, 27. This is R. tenui-armatus of the 2nd and 3rd 
Editions, and is referred by Prof. Babington to R. Balfourianus. 
See “ British Rubi," p. 255. 
R. csesius, 27. 
* Rosa spinosissima, 24. Ill. 
* R. Doniana, 24. Ill. 
* R. villosa ( mollissima ), 24. Ill. 
* R. tomentosa, 25. Ill. 
\ R. scabriuscula, 24. Cowley Park and Cradley. A variety of the 
preceding. A Hereford record. 
R. inodora, 25. In bushy pastures below Malvern Wells, eastward. 
In the 1st Edition Mr. Lees states that this is the R. Borreri of 
Woods; but in the 3rd, 64, he describes it as R. tomentella, Leman. 
Both are now considered varieties of R. canina. 
(To be continued.) 
The Hispid Nature of the Youno of Paludina vivipara. — I have 
been re-reading the very interesting valedictory address by Mr. Wm. 
Jeffrey to the Conchological Society on the “ Nature and Development 
