lUO Proceedings of the Biological Socieh/ of Washington. 
XOTKS ON THE SKUNKS OF 
INDIANA, WITH A CORRECTION. 
In niy “Revision of tlie Sknnksof tlie Genns Cliinclia ” * [—Mephitis], 
I listei.1 under tlie name Chincha mesonielas a'rfa a specimen from Fowler, 
Benton County, Indiana. This specimen was in the collection of Dr. 
C. Hart Merriam, having been purchased from Fletcher M. Noe of 
Indianai)olis, labeled by him with the above locality. Quite recently, 
this specimen with a number of other mammal skins bearing Noe’s 
name as collector and labeled as from various places in Indiana were 
shown to Mr. Vernon Bailey, who instantly recognized them by the 
peculiar make up as having been collected by bimself at Elk River, 
Minnesota and sold to said Noe. Associated with the skuidv skin was an 
undoubted skull of Mephitis mesomelas avia, but in view of the circum¬ 
stances there can be no assurance that it caiiie from Indiana and the 
record above referred to should be disregarded, t The reliability of the 
data with any other specimens bearing Noe’s name that may have found 
their way into collections is thus open to suspicion. 
Evermann and Clark, in their “Notes on the Mammals of the Lake 
iMaxinknckee Region” + (indnenced, probably, by the supposed record 
from Fowler), referred the skunks of that region to Mephitis mesomelas 
avia, but specimens in the Biological Survey from Culver, later secured 
through the aid of Doctor Evermann, prove to be Mephitis mephitis putida, 
as are also specimens from Knox Countjn Mephitis mesomelas avia is 
known at present in Indiana only from a single specimen in the U. S. 
National Museum collected at Effner, on tlie Indiana-Illinois boundary. 
—Arthur H. Hoirell. 
NOTE ON ANAS CRISTATA GMELIN. 
Count Salvadori§ says of Anus cristata: “This species is not a very 
typical member of the genus .Inas.” When a species does not conform 
to the diagnosis of a genus or does not fit in one without making it too 
elastic, I believe that it is best to remove such species, and accordingly I pro¬ 
pose Lophonetta with Anas cristata GmeVin as the type, with the follow¬ 
ing diagnosis: 
Differs from Anas in possessing a hair-like nuchal crest; in the middle 
tail-feathers being lengthened, broad, and acute, not recurved; and in 
having the tail composed of only 14 feathers instead of lS-20. 
The two races will stand as follows: 
Lophonetta cristata cristata (Gmelin). 
[Anas] cristata Gmei.ix, 8ys. Nat. i, 2, 178b, d40. 
Lophonetta cristata alticola (Menegaux). 
Anas cristata alticola Menegaux, Rev. Fran. Orn. I, .Jan. 7, 1910, llU. 
— J. II. Riley. 
* N. Am. Fauna, No. 20, 1901. p. 31. ~ 
+ Tlie Elk River Skunk is Mephitis hudsonicn. 
t IToc. Wash. Acad. Sci., XIll, 1911, p. 29. 
$Cat. Birds Br. Mas., xxvii, 1895, 217. 
