Recent Papers on CEnothera Mutations. 
2 99 
LITERATURE REFERRED TO. 
1. Andrews, F. M. “Twin hybrids {lata and velutina) and their anatomical 
distinctions.” Bot. Gaz., Vol. 50, 1910, pp. 193-201. 
2. Bartlett, H. H. “ Systematic studies on CEnothera. II. The delimitation 
of CEnothera biennis L.” Rhodora, Vol. 15, 1913, pp. 
48-53, 2 plates. 
3. 
11 
“ Systematic studies on CEnothera. III. New species 
from Ithaca, New York.” Rhodora, Vol. 15, 1913, 
pp. 81-85. 
4. 
Davis, B. M. 
“ Cytological studies on CEnothera. I. Pollen development 
of 0. grandiflora.” Ann. Bot., Vol. 23, 1909, pp. 551- 
571, plates 41-42. 
5. 
11 
“ Cytological studies on CEnothera. II. The reduction 
divisions of 0. biennis.” Ibid., Vol. 24, 1910, pp. 631- 
651, plates 52-53. 
6. 
11 
“ Cytological studies on CEnothera. III. A comparison of 
the reduction divisions of 0. Lamarckiana and 0. 
gigas.” Ibid., Vol. 25, 1911, pp. 941-974, plates 71-73. 
7. 
11 
“ Genetical studies on CEnothera. I. Notes on the behaviour 
of certain hybrids of CEnothera in the first generation.” 
Amer. Naturalist, Vol. 44, 1910, pp. 108-115. 
8. 
1.1 
“ Genetical studies on CEnothera. II. Some hybrids of 0. 
biennis and O. grandiflora that resemble O. Lamarckiana.” 
Ibid., Vol. 45, 1911, pp. 193-233, 18 figs. 
“ Genetical studies on CEnothera. III. Further hybrids of O. 
biennis and O. grandiflora that resemble O. Lamarckiana. ’ ’ 
Ibid., Vol. 46, 1912, pp. 377-427, 15 figs. 
9. 
* 1 
10. 
11 
“Was Lamarck’s evening primrose ( CEnothera Lamarckiana 
Seringe) a form of CEnothera grandiflora Solander ? ” 
Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, Vol. 39, 1912, pp. 519-533, 3 
plates. 
10a. 
11 
“The problem of the origin of Enothera Lamarckiana De 
Vries.” New Phytologist, Vol. 12, 1913, pp. 233- 
241. 1 Fig. 
11. 
De Vries, H. 
“ Ueber doppeltreziproke Bastarde von CEenothera biennis 
L. und O. muricata L.” Biol. Centralbl., Bd. 31, 
1911, pp. 97-104. 
12. 
1 > 
“Die Mutationen in der Erblichkeitslehre.” Berlin, 
1912, 42 pp. 
13. 
1 1 
and Bartlett, H. H. “The evening primroses of Dixie 
Landing, Alabama.” Science, N.S., Vol. 30, 1912, 
pp. 599-621. 
13a. 
Gates, R. R. 
“A study of reduction in Enothera rubrinervis.” Bot. 
Gazette, Vol. 46, 1908, pp. 1-34, pis. 1-3. 
14. 
11 
“ Early historico-botanical records of the CEnotheras.” 
Proc. Iowa, Acad. Sci., 1910 (published 1911), pp. 
85-124, 6 plates. 
15. 
> 1 
“ Mutation in Enothera .” Amer. Naturalist, Vol. 45, 1911, 
pp. 577-606. 
16. 
11 
“ Pollen formation in Enothera gigas.” Ann. Bot., Vol. 
25, 1911, PP- 909-940, 4 plates. 
17. 
11 
“ Somatic mitoses in Enothera.” Ann. Bot., Vol. 26, 
1912, pp. 993-1010, pi. 1. 
18. 
11 
“ Parallel mutations in Enothera biennis.’' Nature, Vol. 89, 
1912, pp. 659-660. 
19. 
11 
“ A new CEnothera.” Rhodora, Vol. 15, 1913, pp. 45-48, 2 
plates. 
20. 
11 
“ Tetraploid mutants and chromosome mechanisms.” 
Biol. Centralbl., Bd. 33, 1913, pp. 92-99, 113-150, 7 
figs. 
21. 
11 
“ A contribution to a knowledge of the mutating CEno¬ 
theras.” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 8, 
Pt. 1, 1913, pp. 1-67, 6 plates. 
