22 
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE AND COTTAGE GARDENER. 
January 11, 1894. 
Bernard, which was scarcely anywhere to be seen throughout 
the Show. 
When we consider that there are already no fewer than twenty- 
seven varieties on the list which were not even in existence in 1889, 
and that many of these are improvements on those previously in 
cultivation, the only wonder is that any of the older kinds should 
retain their places as well as they do. Yiviand Morel, the premier 
flower, was, as I before stated, sent out in 1891 ; Florence Davis 
(No. 6), a very popular variety with the general public, is of the 
same year ; also W. Tricker (No. 7). Next we reach Col. 
W. B. Smith, the champion new flower of the last Exhibition, 
which, although it only came out the year before, was nevertheless 
staged oftener than any other Jap of recent introduction. W. H. 
Lincoln (No. 9), an 1890 kind, was again well shown. Gloire du 
Rocher (No. 10) maintains its position fairly well. Mdlle. Marie 
Hoste (1891) has risen since the previous analysis from No. 33 to 
No. 15. Mr. A. H. Neve (1890) still holds its own at No. 15. 
Louis Boehmer (1891), however, falls from No. 15 to No. 21 ; 
Alberic Lunden (1890), on the other hand, rises from No. 44 to 
No. 22. G. C. Schwabe (1892) already takes up a place at No. 25, 
while Charles Davis, of the same year, is only two steps lower 
down, at No. 27. Mrs. C. Harman Payne (1892), also new to the 
analysis, will be found at No. 29 ; Excelsior and Lord Brooke, also 
1892 sorts, at No. 32, W. Seward (1892, but only sent out last 
spring) at No. 33, John Shrimpton (sent out at the same time) at 
No. 40, Vice-President Audiguier (1890) also at No. 40> 
followed by Mr. E. Beckett at No. 41. Lower down we reach 
Mrs. Alpheus Hardy, Cesare Costa, Lilian B. Bird, R. C. Kingston, 
Amos Perry, Mr. Charles Blick, J. S. Dibbens, and Miss Dorothy 
Shea, also all sent out during the last few years. In the next 
analysis many of the above will, no doubt, greatly improve their 
positions, while several sterling novelties of still more recent 
introduction also appear likely to give a good account of themselves 
I here append, as usual, select lists of varieties in the sections 
other than those devoted to the incurved and Japanese. In each 
case the different sorts are arranged according to their average 
records at the last six or less exhibitions, as the case may be. The 
varieties marked with an asterisk are new to the analysis. 
Reflexed. —Cullingfordi, King of Crimsons, Cloth of Gold, Pink 
Christine, White Christine, Golden Christine, Peach Christine, 
Dr. Sharpe, Chevalier Domage, Mr. M. Sullivan, and R. Smith.* 
Large Anemones. —Mrs. Judge Benedict, Lady Margaret, Gluck, 
Miss Annie Lowe, Delaware,* W. & G. Drover, Gladys Spaulding 
Empress, Grand Alveole, J. Thorpe, jun., Mdlle. Nathalie Brun.* 
INCURVED VARIETIES. 
Position in Present 
Analysis. 
Average Number of 
Times Shown. 
1 
No. of Times 
Shown in 1893 in 
True Relative Propor¬ 
tion to the Average. 
Name 
Date of 
Introduction. 
Raiser’s 
or 
Introducer’s 
Name. 
Colour. 
1 
56-3 
34 
Empress of India. 
1861 
Downie, Laird & Laing 
Pure white 
2 
48-0 
85 
Queen of England . 
1847 
J. Salter. 
Delicate rose blush 
3 
468 
80 
Lord Alcester . 
1882 
Freemantle . 
Pale primrose 
4 
46-3 
20 
Golden Empress of India . 
1877 
Loader .;. 
Pale yellow 
5 
43 0 
43 
Madame Darier. 
1890 
Sautel. 
Yellow, shaded purple 
6 
40 9 
48 
Jeanne d’Arc. 
1881 
Lacroix . 
Blush white, tipped purple 
7 
40 0 
24 
Golden Queen of England . 
1859 
J. Salter. 
Pale straw colour 
8 
39 2 
40 
Princess of Wales. 
1865 
Davis . 
Blush, tinted rose 
9 
38-8 
36 
Miss Violet Tomlin . 
1888 
Doughty. 
Bright violet purple 
10 
37 3 
27 
Miss M. A. Haggas . 
1888 
Hayes. 
Soft bright yellow 
11 
37'2 
38 
Lord Wolseley . 
1883 
Orchard . 
Bronzy red 
12 
33-2 
21 
Alfred Salter. 
1856 
J. Salter. 
Clear lilac pink 
13 
32 0 
31 
Prince Alfred . 
1863 
Davis . 
Rose carmine, shaded purple 
14 
305 
23 
Mrs. S. Coleman . 
1889 
Russell . 
Bright rose, shaded yellow 
15 
29-5 
14 
John Doughty . 
1889 
Doughty. 
Bronze fawn, suffused rose 
16 
270 
17 
Nil Desperandum . 
1862 
Smith. 
Dark orange red 
17 
26-0 
26 
Monsieur R. Bahuant. 
1890 
Hoste . 
Rose purple 
18 
23 8 
14 
John Salter . 
1866 
J. Salter. 
Cinnamon, orange centre 
19 
23-1 
20 
Mrs. Heale. 
1867 
Heale. 
Pure white 
20 
22'5 
14 
Lady Hardinge. 
1861 
Clark . 
Silvery rose 
21 
21-8 
11 
Barbara . 
1869 
J Salter . 
Bright amber, shaded orange 
Fawn colour 
22 
21-3 
8 
Mrs. W. Shipman. 
1878 
Shipman. 
23 
20-6 
16 
Princess of Teck . 
1868 
Pethers . 
White, suffused pink 
24 
200 
20 
Baron Hirsch . 
1892 
Owen . 
Golden buff 
25 
19 0 
2 
Jardin des Plantes . 
1859 
J. Salter . 
Deep golden yellow 
26 
17 0 
16 
Hero of Stoke Newington . 
1873 
Forsyth . 
Rose pink 
27 
16 0 
16 
Robert Cannell. 
1889 
Cannell . 
Deep golden buff 
28 
15 0 
19 
Alfred Lyne . 
1888 
Lyne . 
Rose lilac 
29 
13-4 
11 
Empress Eugdnie. 
1866 
Pethers . 
Rosy lilac 
Rich purple maroon 
30 
13-3 
10 
Reful gens . 
1873 
Hock . 
31 
130 
13 
Ami Hoste. 
1890 
Sautel. 
Buff yellow, striped carmine 
32 
12 3 
3 
Mr. Brunlees. 
1884 
Smith. 
Indian red, tipped gold 
33 
12 0 
11 
Camille B. Flammarion . 
1889 
Sautel. 
Dark violet 
33 
12 0 
12 
Madame P. Mistral. 
1890 
Sautel. 
Violet rose, tipped salmon 
33 
12-0 
12 
Mrs. Robinson King . 
1891 
Hotham. 
Rich yellow 
Delicate rosy pink 
33 
12-0 
12 
Princess Beatrice . 
1868 
Wyness . 
34 
11-2 
7 
Cherub . 
1862 
Smith. 
Orange, tinted rose bronze 
Cinnamon buff, suffused rose 
35 
10 8 
12 
Lady Dorothy . 
1887 
Buss . 
36 
8 0 
8 
Brookleigh Gem . 
1892 
Cante . 
Lilac pink 
37 
7-8 
5 
Mr. Bunn . 
1881 
Bunn . 
Bright golden yellow 
Blush 
38 
7-0 
6 
Novelty. 
1860 
Clark . 
39 
6 5 
3 
White Venus. 
1872 
Shrimpton. 
Pure white 
40 
6-3 
3 
Prince of Wales . 
1865 
Davis . 
Purple 
Rich golden yellow 
41 
5-9 
7 
Mrs. Norman Davis. 
1886 
Mizen. 
42 
5 3 
5 
Charles Gibson. 
1887 
Mizen. 
Bronze red, centre fawn 
43 
5-0 
5 
Lucy Kendall . 
1892 
Owen . 
Coral red 
