28 
Recent Ornithological Literature 
ment on Mock and Forbes (1994). Auk 114: 137- 
140. (Sch. For. Environ. Stud., Yale Univ., New Ha¬ 
ven, CT 06511, USA.)—Questions model (Auk 111: 
115).—J.R.F. 
Stipniece, a. 1994. Midwinter coastal counts in Lat¬ 
via in 1993. IWRB Seaduck Res. Group Bull. 4: 16- 
18. (Inst. Biol., Miera 3, Salaspils, LV-2169, Latvia.) 
Stuart-Smith, K. 1991. Do lemming, vole, and 
snowshoe hare cycles affect other small birds and 
mammals in northern ecosystems? Musk-Ox 39: 
181-188. (Dept. ZooL, Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, 
AB T6G 2E9, Can.)—Examines ''alternative prey 
hypothesis" using holarctic data.—G.S. 
Sutherland, W. J., & S. R. Baillie. 1993. Patterns in 
the distribution, abundance and variation of bird 
populations. Ibis 135: 209-210. (Sch. Biol. Sci., 
Univ. East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.)—Anal¬ 
ysis using populations of UK birds.—^J.V.B. 
SVAZAS, S., G. Vaitkus, & G. Grishanov. 1994. Re¬ 
port on aerial midwinter counts of waterfowl in 
Lithuanian and Kaliningrad near-shore waters in 
1993. IWRB Seaduck Res. Group Bull. 4: 19-25. 
(Inst. EcoL, Akademiijos 2, 2600 Vilnius, Lithua¬ 
nia.)—Large numbers of Clangula hyemalis, Melan- 
itta fusca, Mergiis merganser and Bucephala clangu¬ 
la.—D.J.LM. 
Tidemann, E. R, K. B. H. Tidemann, & C. R. Tide- 
MANN. 1996. Importance of Yellow Box-Blakely's 
Red Gum woodland remnants in maintaining 
bird species diversity: inferences from seasonal 
data. Corella 20: 117-128. (Sch. Resour. Environ. 
Manage., Aust. Natl. Univ., Canberra, ACT 0200, 
Australia.)—Serve as breeding sites and winter ref¬ 
uges.—I.D.E. 
Tomialojc, L., & T. Wesolowski. 1996. Structure of 
a primaeval forest bird community during the 
1970s and 1990s (Bialowieza National Park, Po¬ 
land). Acta Ornithol. (Warsaw) 31: 133-154. (Mus. 
Nat. Hist., Dept. Avian EcoL, Wroclaw Univ., Sien- 
kiewicza 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland.)—Commu¬ 
nity structure and breeding densities compared on 
same plots between the two time periods.—^J.P. 
Triquet, a. M., G. a. McPeek, & W. C. McComb. 
1990. Songbird diversity in clearcuts with and 
without a riparian buffer strip. J. Soil Water Con- 
serv. 45: 500-503. (Dept. For., Univ. Kentucky, Lex¬ 
ington, KY 40506, USA.)— Icteria virens, Passerina 
cyanea, Pipilo erythrophthalmiis, Wilsonia citrina, Opo- 
rornis formosus, Empidonax virescens, Vireo olivaceus, 
Dendroica virens. 
Vaitkus, G. 1994. Seabird densities in central and 
eastern Baltic during late winter 1993. IWRB Sead¬ 
uck Res. Group Bull. 4: 42-47. (Lab. Ornithol., Inst. 
EcoL, Akademijos St. 2, 2600 Vilnius, Lithuania.)— 
Ship transect surveys.—D.J.L.M. 
Van Stappen, J. F., & M. E. Dallman. 1996. Apostle 
Islands National Lakeshore [Wisconsin] 1995 
Breeding Bird Survey report. Passenger Pigeon 58: 
35-46. (Apostle Islands Natl. Lakeshore, Rt. 1, Box 
4, Bayfield, WI 54814, USA.) 
Waterhouse, R. D. 1997. Some observations on the 
ecology of the Rainbow Lorikeet Trichoglossus 
haematodus in Oatley, South Sydney [Australia]. 
CoreUa 21: 17-24. (4/1-5 Ada St., Oatley, NSW 
2223, Australia.)—Mainly exotic food resources 
and aggressive defence of nest hollows has allowed 
recolonisation of suburban area.—I.D.E. 
Watts, B. D., & D. S. Bradshaw. 1996. Population 
expansion by Double-crested Cormorants in Vir¬ 
ginia. Raven 67: 75-78. (Ctr. Conserv. Biol., Coll. 
William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA.)— 
Phalacrocorax auritus nest numbers increased from 
8 to 402 from 1985 to 1995. Describe 5 known 
breeding sites.—R.B.C. 
Watts, B. D., D. S. Bradshaw, & R. R. Cross. 1996. 
Annual plover survey of the Virginia barrier is¬ 
lands: a ten year summary. Raven 67: 84-89. (Ctr. 
Conserv. Biol., Coll. William & Mary, Williams¬ 
burg, VA 23195, USA.)—From 1986 to 1995 Charad- 
rius melodus breeding populations averaged 104.7 
pairs and from 1989 to 1995 Charadrius wilsonia 
breeding populations averaged 39.9 pairs. Virginia 
holds 17.1% of Atlantic Coast and 5.4% of total 
population of Charadrius melodus. —R.B.C. 
Weller, M. W., E. H. Smith, & R. M. Taylor. 1996. 
Waterbird utilization of a freshwater impound¬ 
ment on a coastal Texas wildlife refuge. Texas J. 
Sci. 48: 319-328. (Dept. Wildl. Fish. Sci., Texas 
A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2258, USA.) 
White, R., et al. 1996. Survey of breeding Common 
Gulls in the Correen Hills and Mortlach Hills, 
Grampian, 1995 summary report. JNCC Report 
224. (JNCC, Seabirds & Cetaceans Br., Dunnet Ho., 
7 Thistle PI., Aberdeen ABIO lUZ, IJK.)—Larus can- 
us in Scotland.—^J.V.B. 
Williams, B., et al. 1996. The 1995 beach-nesting 
and colonial waterbird survey of the Virginia bar¬ 
rier islands. Raven 67: 79-83. (154 Lakeswood Dr., 
Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA.)—1995 survey 
found a pair of Pelecanus erythrorhynchos at an emp¬ 
ty nest in Jun on Fishermans Island, a species that 
has not as yet bred in Virginia. Numbers for Ardea 
herodias, Casmerodius albus, and Eudocimus albus 
were high, those for other herons low. Charadrius 
wilsonia and Charadrius melodus continued to in¬ 
crease but Haematopus palliatus continued to de¬ 
cline. Populations of larger gulls were stable, but 
Earus atricilla reached an all time low. Population 
trends in gulls and skimmers were mixed.—R.B.C. 
Wilson, S. 1996. Irruption of Boreal Owls, winter 
1995-1996. Loon 68: 228-231. (P.O. Box 607, Tower, 
MN 55790, USA.)—176 of 212 Aegolius funereus 
sightings in Minnesota were of dead or dying 
birds; see also Loon 68: 221-228.—D.L.E. 
WiRTZ, W. O. 1991. Avifauna in southern California 
chaparral: seasonal distribution, habitat associa¬ 
tion, reproductive phenology. USD A, For. Serv. 
Issue 74 
29 
Res. Paper PSW-RP-209. (Pacific SW Res. Stn.: P.O. 
Box 245, Berkeley, CA 94701-0245, USA.)—Docu¬ 
ments changes in species composition in the San 
Gabriel Mountains, CA, between the late 1930's 
and the 1970's.—W.M.G. 
Witt, J. W. 1996. Long-term population monitoring 
of Osprey along the Umpqua River in western 
Oregon. J. Raptor Res. 30: 62-69. (USBLM, 777 NW 
Garden Valley Blvd., Roseburg, OR 97470, USA.)— 
Artificial nesting platforms and perches contribut¬ 
ed to 153% increase in population of Pandion hal- 
iaetus from 1981-90.—^J.P.S. 
Zang, H. 1997. [Population development, altitudinal 
distribution and settling behavior of Ficedula hy- 
poleuca in the Harz Mountains.] J. Ornithol. 138: 
39-49. (Oberer Triftweg 31A, D-38640 Goslar, Ger¬ 
many.)—60% population decline led to reductions 
in altitudinal limits and settling area. (German, 
Engl, summ.)—P.H.B. 
A Special Publication 
Kanji, G. K., ED. 1995. Statistics and ornithology. J. 
Appl. Stat. 22: 557-1081. (Div. Appl. Stat., Sch. 
Computing Manage. Sci., Sheffield Hallam Univ., 
100 Napier St., Sheffield Sll 8HD, UK.)—Special 
issue presents the results of the Sep 1994 European 
Union for Bird Ringing (EURING) Conf. held at the 
Patuxent Environ. Sci. Ctr., Laurel, MD. Topics cov¬ 
ered include estimation and modeling of avian sur¬ 
vival, avian movement, migration and recruitment, 
computer software, application of banding to ques¬ 
tions in evolutionary ecology, application of band¬ 
ing to conservation and management.—R.B.C. 
Aebischer, N. j. 1995. Investigating the effects of 
hunting on the survival of British pigeons and 
doves by analysis of ringing recoveries. Pp. 
923-934. (Game Conserv. Trust, Fordingbridge, 
Hampshire SP6 lEF, UK.)—Change in British 
hunting regulations had no effect on annual sur¬ 
vivorship of Stock Dove, Columba oenas, or Col¬ 
lared Dove, Streptopelia decaocto, but Wood- 
pigeons, Columba palumbus, have increased de¬ 
spite heavy shooting. 
Arnason, a. N., & C. J. Schwarz. 1995. POPAN-4: 
enhancements to a system for the analysis of 
mark-recapture data from open populations. 
Pp. 785-800. (Dept. Comp. Sci., Univ. Manitoba, 
Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Can.)—Program adds a 
general procedure for fitting constrained models 
based on a new unified theory for Jolly-Seber 
models; it allows constraints to be imposed on 
capture, survival and birth rates over time and/ 
or across attribute groups (sex, age), and can 
model such rates using covariate models with 
auxiliary variables such as sampling effort. 
Baillie, S. R. 1995. Uses of ringing data for the 
conservation and management of bird popula¬ 
tions: a ringing scheme perspective. Pp. 967- 
987. (BTO, Natl. Ctr. Ornithol., The Nunnery, 
Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.)—Review of 
current and potential use of banding recovery 
and mark-recapture methods for conservation- 
oriented research by European ringing schemes 
with comments on the data holdings and data 
gathering potential of the 33 European ringing 
schemes. 
Bauchau, V., & A. J. Van Noordwijk. 1995. Com¬ 
parison of survival estimates obtained from 
three different methods of recapture in the 
same population of the Great Tit. Pp. 1031- 
1037. (Netherlands Inst. EcoL, Ctr. Terrestrial 
EcoL, Boterhoeksestr. 22, P.O. Box 40, 6666 ZG 
Heteren, The Netherlands.)—Analysis of 20 
years of captures of Parus major to determine best 
methods of recapture for estimating survival. 
Capture of adults feeding young at nest was bet¬ 
ter than capture of birds roosting in nest-boxes 
or by mist-netting. 
Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, & G. G. White. 
1995. Selection among open population cap¬ 
ture-recapture models when capture probabili¬ 
ties are heterogenous. Pp. 611-624. (USGS/BRD, 
Colorado State Univ., 201 Waglar Bldg., Fort Col¬ 
lins, CO 80523, USA.)—Model size increased 
with sample size, and heterogeneity in capture 
probabilities had negligible effects on model se¬ 
lection for both Akaie's Information Criterion 
and a dimension-consistent criterion. 
Catchpoll, E. A. 1995. MATLAB: an environment 
for analyzing ring-recovery and recapture data. 
Pp. 801-816. (Dept. Math. Stat., Univ. Coll., 
UNSW, Canberra, A.C.T. 2600, Australia.)—Pro¬ 
gram use shown in analysis of band recovery 
data on Grey Herons, Ardea cinerea, with and 
without covariates. Eagle, a package of simple 
MATLAB programs for analysis of band-recov¬ 
ery data, used to fit a simple model to some re¬ 
capture data on Herring Gulls, Earus argentatus. 
Catchpoll, E. A., S. N. Freeman, & B. J. T. Mor¬ 
gan. 1995. Modelling age variation in survival 
and reporting rates for recovery models. Pp. 
597-609. (Dept. Math. Stat., Univ. Coll., UNSW, 
Canberra, A.C.T. 2600, Australia.)—Guidelines 
for fitting models to data for birds banded as 
young when age dependence is expected in the 
reporting probability. 
Clobert, j. 1995. Capture-recapture and evolution¬ 
ary ecology: a difficult wedding? Pp. 989-1008. 
(Lab. EcoL, Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai 
Saint Bernard, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.)— 
Reviews potential for applying capture-marking- 
resighting models to current questions in evolu¬ 
tionary ecology, particularly with respect to mea¬ 
suring cost of reproduction and trade-offs. 
Conroy, M. J. 1995. Comparison of programs 
MULT, ESTIMATE, and BROWNIE. Pp. 763- 
773. (USGS/BRD, Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit, 
