190 
lleconh (>/ the Geological Surrey of India. 
[voi,. XIIr. 
a few fossils wliicli in 1872 were brought by Mr. Hacket. They were already 
mentioned, and some figured in my Jabalpur Floraand referred to as from 
“ South Rewah.” I have since found a label referring to these South Rewab 
fossils and giving some information as to the locality. 
Ohandia, small nadi south of,—South Rewah, Singwara district. 
Collectio Hacket, 1872. 
1877. Feistmantel, Floi'a of the Jabalpur group, etc , Pal. Ind., IX,, 2. 
Ahtlinpteris medlicottiana. Fstm., a small specimen not mentioned in my Jabalpur 
flora, found subsequently, will be figured together with Mr. Hughes’ specimens. 
Sagenopieris ? sp.,’ Feistm., 1. c., p. 10,‘PI. Ill, fig. 6. 
JPodosamiies laneeolatus, L. & H., /. c., p. 11, PI. Ill, figs. 7,8, 11, 12. 
Podezamites .ipafhnlatus, Fstm., 1. c., p. 12, PI. IV, figs. 11, 12. 
Araucarites cutchensis, Fstm., 1. c., p. 16, PI. XIV, figs. 11—13. 
Echmostrohus expanstis, Sohimp., p. 17, PI. XI, fig. 5. 
Ech. rliomhicus, Fstm., J. c., p. 18, PI. XI, figs. 6—11. 
Fubther notes on the coerelation op the Gondwana flora with other floras 
hy Ottokar Feistmantel, M.D., Palmontologist, Geological Survey of India. 
Flora of the Kusnezh basin and Tungusha river, Siberia. 
In a short note in the first number of this year’s Records with I’eference to a 
preliminary paper of Mr. Schmalhausen on the Jurassic flora of the Kusnezk basin 
and Tung.ska river, I compared the Indian (and Australian) leaves formerly 
known as NoggeratMa, but distinguished by me as Noggernthiopsis, with the Sibe¬ 
rian Uhiptozamites Sohmalh, which also had at first been described as Noggerathia. 
I have since received Prof. Schmalhausen’s work, illusti’ated with sixteen plates,® 
and I would now complete my reference to his observations. 
My supposition of our Noggerathiopsis and the Siberian Ehiptozamites, Schmalh. 
being in closest relation is now confirmed. The size and form of the leaves 
and the characters of the veins is in both genera completely identical; the 
only difference between them being that the veins in Bhiptozamites are closer. 
This character might eventually be taken as a speeifical distinction only, while 
yet the two genera might be identical. This of course is not necessarily of much 
consequence regarding the correlation of the two formations in which these 
genera are found; but their close generical relation (perhaps identity) i.s of great 
importance in fixing the sj^stematical position of the one from the other. 
Prof. Schmalhausen places his Bhpfozam ites * (which name by itself implies the 
* Pal. Indica, Ser. IX, pt. 2. 
’ In the paper quoted the locality of this fossil is by mistake given as Jabalpur instead of 
South Rewah. 
® Beitriige zur .Tnra-Flora Russlar.ds, von Joh Sclnnalhansen, in Mem. de I’Acad. Iinper. 
des Sc. de St. Petersbonrg VII, Ser., Tome XXVII., No. 4. 
* piiTTU)- 1“ off, and Zarnia —botanical name. 
