358 
MR. W. C. D. WHETHAM ON IONIC VELOCITIES. 
From Kohlrausch’s theory we can calculate 
/• 3-80 X 10“^^ 
V = 10352 = 10352 -—- = 0'000079 centim. per second. 
From the close agreement of these numbers, it is, I think, fair to conclude that 
Kohlrausch’s theory holds good in the case of alcoholic solutions, at all events Avhen 
they are moderately dilute. 
The case of the chloride, where the agreement is not so good, seems even more 
interesting than that of the well-behaved nitrate, and to be worthy of closer exami¬ 
nation. The irregularities only appear when the concentration of the solutions is 
considerable, and we may assume that the agreement with theory would be closer for 
more dilute solutions if the difficulties of observing them could be surmounted. But 
how are we to explain the phenomena shown by strong solutions ? The velocity of 
the junction becomes uncertain, several distinct lines often appear, bounding different 
shades between red and blue, and some of these may travel in the opposite direction 
to that indicated by theory and actually observed in the case of dilute solutions. On 
any theory of ionic charges, it seems impossible that an ion, as such, should travel in 
a direction against the electric forces, and we are forced to the supposition that the 
part of the salt which we see travelling thus is composed of non-electrolytic mole¬ 
cules, and is in reality attached to the opposite ion to form a complex structure which 
moves with the electric forces. The only other possible explanation seems to be the 
supposition that there is a proper motion of the solvent on which the ionic velocities 
are superposed, and that in some cases the motion of the solvent in one direction is 
greater than that of the ion in the other. Even neglecting the mechanical disturb¬ 
ances which would then appear, this view is untenable, firstly, because a motion of 
the solvent is disproved by another series of experiments, which I hope soon to 
publish, and, secondly, because the reversed motion is observed in strong solutions of 
both cobalt nitrate-cobalt chloride, and cobalt chloride-calcium chloride. The motion 
of the boundary in these two cases is in opposite directions with reference to the 
current, hence we cannot explain matters by a motion of the solvent in one direction. 
The hypothesis of complex ions, advanced to explain the abnormal migration 
constant of cadmium iodide in alcohol must, therefore, be extended to these solutions. 
The cases are not quite parallel, for the phenomena shown by cadmium iodide can be 
explained if we imagine molecules of Cdl 2 joined to the anion only, wffiile in our case, 
since both pairs of solutions used show reversed motion when sufficiently strong, we 
must suppose that molecules of undecomposed salt are connected both to the anion 
and to the kation. 
I hope soon to be able to publish an account of some further experiments bearing 
on the question of complex ioiis, and of others connected with several points in the 
subject of electrolysis. 
