GENERAL DISCUSSION OF SPECTROSCOPIC RESULTS. 
4(;7 
Abnormal Fe Lines, 
In sun. 
In Hash. 
If 
Remarks. 
enhanced. 
Wavedength. 
Intensity. 
AVavedength. 
Intensity. 
: 
Lines strong- in tlasli 
o 
3558-67 
8 
3558-9 
20 
1 
3570-27 
20 
3570-33 
30 
3634-47 
3 
3634-48 
5 
1 
3647-99 
12 
3647-98 
15 
1 
3856-52 
8 
3856•47 
15 
No 
4179-03 
3 
4179-1 
8 
Yes 
4233-33 
4 
4233-3 
10 
Yes 
4325-94 
8 
4325•8 
15 
No 
4401-93 
10 
4404-8 
20 
No 
4515-51 
3 
4515-6 
8 
Yes 
4584-02 
4 
4583•9 
25 
Yes 
4924-11 
5 
4924-1 
25 
Yes 
5018-63 
4 
5018-5 
20 
Yes 
I 
iines weak or absent in flash and exceeding intensity Gin O. 
3536-71 
7 
Absent 
_ 
1 
Spectrum very weak here. 
3651-61 
7 
3651-85 
0 
1 
3680-07 
9 
3680-4± 
0 
? 
IIt interferes at 3679-4. 
3684-26 
7 
3684-29 
0 
1 
Ti line at 3685 • 3 interferes. 
3701-23 
8 
3701-28 
3 
3705-71 
9 
3705-67 
51 
No 
J Flash line confitscd with strong 
t line at 3706 • 09. 
3850-12 
10 
3850-26 
2 
No 
3878-15 
8 
Absent 1 
— 
No 
J This line seems to be present on 
t some images not measured. 
4528-80 
8 
4529-0 
1 
No 
Titanium Lines in Sun and Flash. 
rncluding all lines in Lowland’s table assigned to Ti only between X 3500 and X 5000, 
exce})ting those which are obscured in the flash by strong hydrogen lines. 
Row'LANd’s intensity 
in 0. 
Number of lines 
in O. 
Number of lines 
in fia.sh. 
Percentage of lines 
in flash. 
Average intensity 
in flash. 
1 
38 
0 
0 
2 
28 
5 
18 
10^ 
3 
27 
9 
33 
8 
4 
19 
13 
68 
16 
, 5 
7 
7 
100 
21 
j 6 and 7 
2 
2 
100 
37 
j Over 7 
i 
3 
3 
100 
55 
* The average intensity of the five fia.sli lines is increased by two very abnormal lines at AA 3505’06 
and 3520 ••10, omitting these the average would be 4. 
3 O 2 
