Mr, H. Fittier, 
f"tUMK> *'*oacriial, 
Caracas’ f gnasuela, 
Fear Mr, Pi Hi era 
Tftnr letter of Jims 6 cam® a short time ago, and I am 
glad to have the information wfcich it contained, 
^ight now the only oat tar I went to straighten out with 
you Is that of the two packages® of Jaha specimens about which 
I wrote', *fhe laateriai is still la good condition and hears 
adequate locality data} the only que'-tion is, what numbers 
shall 'we assign to the specimens? I enclose a Hat of the 
m.. rs In this set together with casual ric identifications 
of each;, aim one of the labels. 0§ the list of identifications 
which Ft, Flake turned over to rae there is no entry for numbers 
484„4 R 9, with the exception of 485, 491, and 492, and it is 
barely possible that the plants in question nay represent those 
numbers. Put frosa 501.54? there is a wholly dissimilar set of 
identifications, and, from your letter, 1 judge that at least 
hers there are two sata of plants involved. X wonder if you 
have a similar series of Jahn’s plant® under iSes^ aumSars» If 
not, 1 suggest that l renumber these beginning with his intest 
number 1315 (is this aright?), are la an exceptionally good 
position just now to meant plants, and I would lilt© to turn 
theca in. 
inclosed la a list of Gghriger s s composites... 
Sincerely yours. 
(Enclosures) 
Ulswooth P, Fillip 
Associate Curator 
Division, of Flints, 
