PAPÉIS AVULSOS 
Vol. X — N. 9 2 
[Periço pis] ( Phaloc ) Ciitilitni But.ler, 1875 — Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (4)16:169 
(cit, sin. & geog.). 
C. [hetone ] Catilina Kirby, 1892 — Syn. Cat. Lep. Het., 1:185, n. 15 (cit, sin. 
& geog.). 
Anthomysa brotes Druce, 1895 — Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (6)15:48, $ ç. 
P. [ericopis (C hetone)] catilina Hering, 1925 — in Seitz, G. Schmett., ed. fr. 
II, 6:437; est. 62 a. 
D. \ysschema\ brotes Hering, 1925 — in Seitz, G. Schmett., ed. fr. II, 6:446. 
IPericopis (Chetone) | catilina Bryk, 1931 — Lep. Cat. 45:23 (cit. sin. & geog.). 
(DyrjfcAenia] ? brotes Bryk, 1931 — Lep. Cat. 45:37 (cit. sin. & geog.). 
Pericopis catilina catilina Fleming, 1949 — Zoologica, N. Y., 34(1) :19. 
Notophyson catilina angustiiineata Fleming, 1919. n. comb. 
Referência: ' . 
Pericopis catilina angustiiineata Fleming, 1949 — Zoologica, N. Y., 34 (1) ; 19-20. 
1NCERTAE S A E DIS : 
buckleyi Druce, 1895 
Referências: 
Anthomyza Buckleyi Druce, 1895 — Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (6)15:48-49, ç 
D. {ysschema] f buckleyi Hering, 1925 — in Seitz, G. Schmett., ed. fr., II, 6:446. 
[Dysschema] ? Buckleyi Bryk, 1931 — Lep. Cat. 45:37 (cit. sin. & geog.). 
Comentários — Tendo Hering e Bryk colocado duvidosamen¬ 
te ao lado de Notophyson tiresias a espécie buckleyi, que Druce, 
1895, descrevera como Anthomyza, resolvemos considerá-la em po¬ 
sição incerta, até que estudo morfológico do tipo ou de material 
topótipo, venha esclarecer a sua verdadeira posição sistemática. 
ABSTRACT 
Hübner, 1814, published figures of a moth, which he called Dysschema hx- 
foxantha. He not only gave the luime to the species, but also proposecl the genus 
Dysschema, with the species hypoxantha as the haplotype. Hübner, 1819, proposed 
the genus Pericopis for 4 species, and Kirby, 1892, selccted P. Zerbina Stoll, 1790- 
91 as genotype; this sjtecies afterwards became a synonym of P. eurocilia (Cr , 
1777)^ 
Hübner, 1819, also includ the species tiresias in the genus Dysschema, He¬ 
ring, 1925, removed erroneously hypoxantha to genus Pericopis, leaving the genus 
Dysschema to the species tiresias and heliconides; this was confirmed by Bryk, 
1932, also erroneously. 
cm 
2 3 
L. 
5 6 
10 11 12 13 14 15 
