PART 4 .] 
Feistmantel: Notes on Fossil Floras in India. 
197 
I have to record two forms from our Indian Jurassic deposits (upper portion of Gond- 
wana system)— 
Ginko lobata, Eeistm., figs. 4,5. 
Cyclopteris lobata, Eec. Geol. Surv., 1876, p. 126. 
Gingko, Eec. Geol. Surv., 1877, p. 144. 
This species is from the Jabalpur group (Sher Eiver in the Satpura basin), and was 
described by me at first as Cyclopteris, before Ileer had established the genus Gingko. 
I distinctly pointed out its relation to Cyclopteris digitata, Bgt., which itself is now a 
Gingko digitata, H., of which a splendid specimen is figured in the Jurassic Flora of Spitz- 
bergen, pi. x, f. 2, by Prof. Fleer. 
I saw a difference in our specimen from Gingko digitata in its not being so deeply In¬ 
cised, and called it therefore Cyclopteris lobata, which name I keep in transferring the form 
to Gingko, but state again, that it is very closely related with Gingko digitata from the 
Yorkshire Oolite (Lower Oolite). 
Gingko ckassipes, sp. n., figs. 6, 7. 
Foliis oblonge, rotundatis, basirn versus attenuatis, margine indivisis, hinc inde sub- 
lobatis, nervis creberrimis repetito dichotomis, e basi radiatim eggredientibus, pedicello 
crassiusculo, linea notato. 
This species agrees in the condition of the leaf with Gingko integriuscula, H., from Spitz- 
bergen; our leaf, however, is more oblong: the chief distinction is the thicker peduncle 
of our species, which shows well the point of insertion. The margin is undivided ; here 
and there slightly lobed. Veins are numerous, repeatedly forked, radiary. 
Locality— Our specimens (four altogether) were found in the Eagavapuram shales on 
the Lower Godavari. 
Gingko lobata, Feistm., is from the same place, and in fact preserved in the same speci- 
men of the Jabalpur group on which I first saw the Glossopteris in these beds, and 
Gingko crassipes, sp. n., is from a group which is on the same horizon as the Sripermatur 
group, from which I described the Fryon comp. Farrovensis and as the Kota-Maleri beds. 
Gingko Huttoni, H., from the Middle Jura in Spitzbergeu and E. Siberia, is, according 
to Prof. Fleer's opinion, very close to the living Gingko biloba, Linn., in Japan and 
China. 
2. Two other types of fossil plants from the Jabalpur group, which I have not figured 
in the plates to be published with the descriptions of the fossil flora of that group, are 
represented in the annexed figs. 8 and 9, as I think they are of some interest. 
Fig. 8 shows linear impressions, with oval or round swellings in their length. The 
drawing represents them rather too distinctly. The only fossil which this specimen 
recalls, is the recently-described genus Czckanowskia, Heer (/. c.), which is said to be a 
conifer, the lineal impressions representing leaves, and the swellings being caused by parasitic 
fungi. This specimen is from Jabalpur. 
Fig. 9 represents a set of lanceolate leaves, apparently converging towards the lower 
part, as if they should join there. As far as can be seen, they are traversed by longitudinal 
single veins. This specimen is from the Sher Eiver and recalls Prol. Heer s Fhonicopsis 
(l. c.). 
I do not at present intend to identify the figured specimens with the forms mentioned 
from E. Siberia and the Amur countries. I wish only to indicate the possible relations, as it 
