134 
Records of the Geological Surrey of India. 
[vol. IX. 
c. —An Australian type :— 
1.— Podozamites Hacketi, Fstm.—strikingly close to Podoz. Barlclyi, McCoy— 
from Ballarme Books (Mesozoic—Oolitic) in Australia. 
d. —Two species are Indian types :— 
1. — Ptilopliyllum acutfolium, Mon'.—in the whole range of the Upper Gondwana 
series. 
2. — Palissya indiea, Fstm.—common in the upper portion of the Gondwana series, 
as in Ivach, and in the Bajmahal Hills and Golapili. 
e. —One species is peculiur to the group. 
1 .—Palissya Jabalpurensis, Fstm. Known only in these beds. 
There are therefore— 
10 species lower oolitic. 
1 upper liassic. 
2 of Indian types. 
1 characteristic of the group. 
1 Australian (oolitic) type. 
The other four are peculiar, but more or less allied with those already mentioned. 
If we compare this flora with the other Indian local floras, it has the nearest relation 
with that of Kach. 
Species identical with those in Kach— 
1. Alethopteris Whitbyensis, Gopp. 
2. Ptilopliyllum acutifolium, Morr. 
3. Williamsonia, Carr, genus. 
4. Palissya indiea, Fstm. 
5. Echinusivobus expansus, Sehimp. 
0. Araurarites Knehensis, Fstm. (abundant). 
Species identical with those of the Rajtnahal series— 
1 . Sphenopteris arguta, L. & H. (an oolitic species). 
2. Ptilopliyllum acutifolium, Morr. (Indian type). 
3. Williamsonia, Carr, genus. 
4. Palissya indiea, Fstm. (Indian tp 3 'e). 
Species identical with those in the beds with Ceratodus, &o, in the Godavari region; 
only two species have been found, and both are Jabalpur forms— 
1 . Palissya Jabalpurensis, Fstm. 
2. Araucarit.es Kacheusis, Fstm. 
From these considerations the following conclusions may, I think, be drawn :—• 
1. The prevailing fossils are essentially of such kind as we find generally in lower 
oolite, agreeing with those from Yorkshire; we will therefore have to 
consider our Jabalpur group also of the same age. This conclusion is 
strengthened— 
2. By the occurrence of one distinctly liassic species, Otozamites gracilis, 
Kurr sp. 
