PART 4 .] 
Fei&tmantel: Fossil Floras in India. 
141 
leaves are only detached and formerly belonged to a common stalk. The specimen men¬ 
tioned shows two leaves, about 9 cm. long, of the shape as Bunbury described; they 
are in the same direction lying on one side of a stalk which undoubtedly belongs to these 
leaves. They were, therefore, attached in the same way as in the real Nceggerathia; 
and if we look for a mesozoic Nceggerathia, we find the same arrangement of leaves in the 
Nceggerathia Vosgesiacia* Bronn., from the Keuper of the Eaibl beds. 
Also from the Karharbari coal-field there is one specimen which is to be ranged here. 
The leaves of N. Hislopi, Bunb., differ from N. Vosgesiaca, Bronn. by much stronger 
veins and by having the margin entire. 
Locality. —We have this species, therefore, from Bharat-wada Barkoi, and from 
Karharbari coal-field. 
2.— Nceggerathia comp. Vosgesiaca, Bronn. 
1858. Leonhard and Bronn: N. Jahrb., p. 129, PI. VI, f. 1-1. 
1870-72. Macropterygium Bronni, Soliimp.: Pal. vdgdt., Vol. II, p. 132. 
There is also another Nceggerathia from the Namudas of Kunlacheru (Godavari 
District), which from the first moment I recognized to be a Nceggerathia; some incised and 
lacerated leaves with very fine venation are joined on one common stalk, which, however, is 
partly broken off, so that I was in doubt about the insertion. 
The best, and perhaps only, connection of our specimen I found, however, with Bronn’s 
Nceggerathia Vosgesiaca (1. c.) The author described his species as consisting of a pretty 
large form with a thick stalk, from which passed out on both sides (partly alternating) 
the leaves, marked by two characters— 
1. — By their fine venation, and 
2. —That they arc not entire, hut divided and incised in different manners and 
degrees, so that thej - consist of several lacinice joined together. 
All these characters our specimen above mentioned exhibits too, so that I can only bring 
it in close connection with that triassic species. 
The middle lacinice of our leaf are 12 cm. long, the marginal ones only 5‘6 cm. The 
general form is cuneiform, the venation very fine, running radially towards the margin, 
frequently forked, but the branclilets not much thinner than the main branches. Bronn’s 
drawings do not show this forcation, although Bronn himself describes it. 
L>.—Another Zamice from the Damudas. 
Amongst the specimens brought by Dr. Stoliezka there is still another leaf which by 
the whole form indicates a Zamice. It can, however, not be referred to Nceggerathia, the 
leaf base being quite different, from which it follows that the insertion also differed; we 
have no stalk, but the leaf is only a little attenuated at the base ; it reminds strikingly the 
genus Glossozamites, Schimpf. I have no doubt that ours belongs to it. 
•Broun: Zur triasiachen Fauna und Flora dev bitumiuoBCn Schicfcr von P.aibl, N, Jahreb. fur Min, Gcol. uaffl 
Pal., etc., 1858, p. 139, PI. VI, f. 1-1. 
t Schimpcr ; Pal. v5g5t. Vol., II, p. 163. 
