Neue Litteratur. 
29 ’ 
Lamounctte, Recherches sur l’origine morphologique du über interne. (1. c.) 
Leger, L. J., Sur la presence de laticiferes chez les Fumariacees. (Comptes 
rendus des seances de l’Academie des Sciences de Paris. 1890. 1. Decbr.) 
Swezey, G. D., Simple device for illustrating hydrotropism. (The Botanical 
Gazette. Vol. XV. 1890. p. 311.) 
Systematik und Pflanzengeographie: 
Arbost, J., Rapport sur l’herborisation du 21 juin 1890 a Chatel-Aillon. (Bulletin 
de la Societe botanique de France. Tome XXXVII. 1890. p. XL.) 
— —, Rapport sur les herborisations faites, les 23 et 24 juin 1890, clans l’ile 
de Re. (1. c. p. XLIII.) 
Camus, E. G., Orchidees du Gers. (1. c. p. XCV.) 
Chatin, A., Le Limodorum pres des Essarts. (1. c. p. XCV.) 
Copineau, Charles, Rapport sur l’herborisation faite, le 15 juin, dans les bois 
de St. Christophe. (1. c. p. XXIX.) 
— —, Rapport sur une excursion faite, le 16 juin, j\ Coup-De-Vague. (1. c. 
p. XXXII.) 
Duffort, Rapport sur Texcursion faite, le 14 juin, a Angoulins. (1. c. p. XXV.) 
Feer, H., Recherclies litteraires et synonymiques sur quelques Campanules. 
(Extrait du Journal de Botanique. 1890. 1 octbr. et 1 novbr.) 8°. 21 pp. Paris 
1890. 
Foucaud, J., Sur les herborisations faites par la Societe, les 17 et 18 juin,. 
dans File d’Oleron. (Bulletin de la Societe botanique de France. T. XXXVII. 
1890. p. XXXIV.) 
Hill, E. J., Notes on the flora of the Lake Superior Region. III. (The Botanical 
Gazette. Vol. XV. 1890. p. 304.) 
Jousset, E., Rapport sur Therborisation faite par la Societe, le 20 juin, k Seche- 
Bec et k Saint-Savinien. (Bulletin de la Societe botanique de France. Tome 
XXXVII. 1890. p. XXXVUI.) 
Malinvaud, Ernest, Questions de nomenclature: Recentes vicissitudes du Ranun- 
culus chaerophyllos et du Globularia vulgaris. (1. c. p. LXXXI.) 
Maximowicz, C. J., Flora tangutica. Fase. I. Tbalamiflorae et Discifiorae. 
(Wissenschaftliche Resultate der von N. M. Przewalski nach Central-Asien 
unternommenen Reisen. Pars botanica. Vol. I. 1890.) 4°. XVIII, 114 pp. 
31 Tafeln. St. Petersburg (Eggers & Co. in Comin.) 1890. M. 18.— 
— —, Enumeratio plantarum hucusque in Mongolia nec non adjacente parte 
Turkestaniae sinensis lectarum. Fase, I. Tbalamiflorae et Discifiorae. (I. c. 
Vol. II.) 4°. IV, 146 pp. n.it 14 Tafeln. St. Petersburg (Eggers & Co. in 
Comm.) 1890. M. 12.— 
Mneller, Ferdinand Baron von, Record of hitherto undescribed plants from 
Arnheim’s Land. [Cont.] (Read before the Royal Society N. S. Wales 1890. 
5. Novbr.) 
[Calophyllum Soulattri. 
N. L. Bur mann, Flora Indien 121 (1768). 
'Fall; branchlets at first sliglitly tomentellous; leaves large, on rather 
short stalks, from ovate- to elongate-elliptic, glabrous; racemes short, often 
reduced to fascicules or umbels, always glabrous; flowers comparatively 
small, on stalklets of generally much greater lengtk; sepals four; petals 
none; stamens about tifty; anthers several times longer than broafl; style 
fully «S long as the stamens; fruit relatively small, globular or verging 
somewhat iuto au ovate form, outside dark-coloured, without any lustre.. 
Not previously recorded from Australia, Mr. Holtze found the tree to 
be 30—40 feet high, and the flowers as those of most congeners white 
and fragrant. Our plant accords well with spocimens collected hy Tyes- 
man in Sumatra and by Zollinger in Java. Burmann’s description 
is very brief; for identification therefore must mainly be relied on the 
Malayan vernacular „Soulattri“, which however is applied also to the much 
rarer C. Teysmanni , C. duaypodum and possibly to some other species. 
Nevertheless it is almost sure, that Bur mann had our species, the sub- 
sequently described C. apectabile in view, although Hasskarl regarded the 
plants of Willdenow and of Bur mann as distinct from each other; 
but as De C a n d o 11 e , B 1 \i m e , M i q u e 1, P1 a n c h o n and T riana all 
