RAINFALL COMPARISON FOR YORK 
O 
cs 
00 
CO 
m 
f-H 
CD 
*o 
<D 
r—i 
~4-> 
&D 
G 
• rH 
P 
nd 
c3 
a? 
CD 
u 
ce 
© 
CO 
nd 
<H 
o3 
c3 
a 
• rH 
K 
ci 
a 
■+3 
o 
Sft 
02 
G 
p-* 
02 
<D 
fn 
a3 
© 
P 
c3 
© 
cc 
r—I 
© 
«4H 
O 
CS 
0) 
co >c 
'C © 
Cl >o 
Cl 3C 
CO 
© CO 
CO 
o eft 
o 
ft 
t— o 
o 
« Ol 
CO rT 
© 
K* 
CO r— < 
-H 
•o 
• 
CO ->1 
CO -CO 
•—* 
CO CO 
co 
■p 
1 - >o 
05 
o 
c 
CO OJ 
nh co 
rH 
Oi 
CO 
00 CO 
© 
o 
CO (0) 
o 
CO 
■'}> co 
cC 
3 
— CO 
— °? 
<1 
05 r-l 
© 
CO o 
r— ’ 
© co 
CO 
01 *—i 
© 
CO 
© 
»-ft 
o 
CO o 
1— 
3 
oc »o 
05 
3 
CO —* 
Ol 
►“ft 
TT co 
rH 
>% 
CJ 
H* <M 
oo 
r- 05 
r H 
CO 
05 CO 
00 05 
© 
H 
<05 -H 
I—1 
p. 
»b 
Ol t - 
CO 0-1 
o r- 
co 
S— 
co © 
© 
d 
s 
CO ‘O 
Cl <M 
© 
CO o 
CO 
32 
© 
CO 
C-> 
• • 
• 
P*H 
QC CO 
<M (N 
00 CO 
»o 
c 
c5 
to 
cb i*-> 
OO 
o 
►“ft 
Ol 05 
X c 
X 3 
1 I 
C3 •— i 
C3 
i 
b— H 
<0 <0, 
34 
© © 
© © 
c 
o 
— r -- 
y -» -> 
BO 
r—1 
o3 
o 
O 
H 
o 
X 
w 
o 
<M 
+ 
o 
05 
o 
XI 
o 
© 
•NIJ^ LY r IlYJ 
a hl aaAO yvj^ lv ssaoxg; ao aovxxaoaaj 
rN 23 a 
H ft •- 
