The plan requires stormwater programs in all cities and other urbanized areas in 
the Puget Sound basin phased in over the next 13 years. Local stormwater 
programs are to emphasize source controls and best management practices rather 
than end-of-pipe treatment. 
Control of bacterial poPution from septic systems, farm animals, and recreational 
boating is addressed in the nonpoint program, with special attention given to 
commercial and recreational shellfish areas. The plan requires locally determined 
and implemented nonpoint pollution control action plans in priority watersheds. 
Local efforts are augmented by several state government programs-a boaters task 
force to tackle pollution problems from boats; and several initiatives relating to 
on-site sewage treatment, including a proposal to ensure that systems are 
functioning properly at the time of property sale. 
The protection of Puget Sound wetlands is accomplished by a state level program 
for identification and acquisition of significant wetland habitats. This program is 
augmented by enhancement of local regulatory programs for wetland protection. 
In recognition of the considerable scientific uncertainty that exists about the 
effects of pollution in Puget Sound, the plan also includes programs for research 
and monitoring of the health of the Sound. A comprehensive monitoring program 
is necessary to guide actions over the long term including modification of the plan 
and development of new programs. 
Because the responsibility for protecting Puget Sound involves action by 
individuals, businesses, and all levels of government, education is a key feature of 
the plan. TTie plan contains both education requirements in specific programs and 
an overall education and public involvement program. 
Inherent in the plan is a strong sense of priorities. Decisions on priorities are 
reflected by the Authority’s decision to include some issues and programs in the 
plan and not others. The scheduling of target dates for completion of certain 
programs also reflects decisions on priorities. 
The price tag for this plan is estimated to be approximately $20 million per year 
for agency operating costs. Costs associated with public capital improvement 
programs and private sector compliance with the plan’s provisions would be in 
addition to this amount. One primary funding source for plan implementation will 
be the state’s Water Quality Account, a fund established by the legislature in 1986 
by adding an eight cent per pack tax on cigarettes. 
State and local agencies will be the primary implementers of the plan. Through 
1991, the Authority will provide continuing oversight and technical assistance and 
will work to ensure compliance. The Authority is required to revise and update 
the plan by January 1,1989, and January 1,1991. 
The adoption of the Puget Sound Management Plan is a major milestone for the 
Sound. Tlie plan represents the first comprehensive effort to address the Sound’s 
water quality problems and develop ways to solve them. The problems were not 
created overnight, and they won’t be solved overnight. The plan establishes a 
153 
