316 
OALLEULYPE; FUCOSMARRAXAS; CHARTOGRAPHA. By L. B. Probt. 
no near relationship and the $ sex-patches of the forewing are quite different . For this second species see C. 
macvlata Swinh ., Vol. 4, p. 209, pi. lli. 
nmanda. C. amanda Btlr. (32 d). The wing-pattern is quite distinctive. The “4 tufts” of the forewing (beneath) 
consist of 2 long white pencils from near the base, behind the median and 2nd submedian respectively, and 
2 smaller, dark tufts more distally, one before and the other behind the 2nd submedian. Sikkim, not common. 
51. Genus: Clalleulype Warr. 
Palpus short and upcurved, in this and most of the other external characters agreeing approximately 
with Callabraxas. Discocellulars of the hindwing biangulate; areole of the forewing simple in the type species 
(whitelyi Butt., which lacks a hair-pencil on the underside of the forewing), variable in the compositata Guen. 
section (genus Callygris Th.-Mieg), double in intersectaria Leech, which I have tentatively transferred here on 
account of the short palpus (see Suppl.-Vol. 4. p. 107). For convenience. I repeat the structixral distinctions 
under the species. 
intersectaria. C. (?) intersectaria Leech (Vol. 4, pi. 11 h). Forewing with double areole, without hair-pencil. The 
broken pattern of the forewing, but with large dark basal and midcostal patches, is somewhat reminiscent of 
some Eclipiopera . Szechuan: Omei-shan (type) and Tu-pa-ko. 
convpositata. C. compositata Guen. (Suppl.-Vol. 4, pi. 10g). Forewing with areole very inconstant, simple or double. 
the variation individual, not racial; forewing beneath with a strong hair-pencil, as in Lygris. The exact status 
of the name-typical form is still doubtful, though it is highly probable that it is merely a very rare aberration 
of the junctilineata form, unfortunately bearing the older name; it was said to come from “North China”, which 
was also the type locality of junctilineata Walk., though in the case of the latter author Shanghai is almost cer¬ 
tainly to be understood. Its hindwing above entirely lacks the cell-spot; see Vol. 4, p. 210. Excepting perhaps 
junctilineata. i g from Ichang, I have seen nothing that literally agrees with this type of Guenee's. junctilineata Walk. 
(Vol. 4, pi. 8 d) is by far the commoner form, and has the cell-spot of the hindwing developed both above and 
constrida. beneath. Distributed in E. and Central China, as well as in Japan. — ab. loc. constricta Prout is perhaps con¬ 
fined to North China, i. e. Palaearctic, but it may occur anywhere within the range of the species. The white 
postmedian area is much narrowed, so that the lines which bound it are partly confluent anteriorly. By an 
oversight I referred to this in Suppl.-Vol. 4 (p. 107) as “ nov instead of constricta Prout ; the first publication 
basistrigaria. was in Vol. 4 (p. 210). basistrigaria Wileman (32 d). Forewing with the outermost subterminal dark line 
scarcely interrupted, the 2nd group of lines thickened, almost confluent to form a single band (as also, however, 
in some c. compositata) . Hindwing with the subapical black spot almost obsolete on the upperside, the anterior 
apothetica. 2 subterminal spots well isolated. A pair from Kanshirei, Formosa. apothetica subsp. nov. is a further deve¬ 
lopment of basistrigaria-, forewing with the snbterminal line as in c. compositata , the group of dark lines variable 
blit, with a tendency to thickening or confluence; hindwing with subapical and subterminal spots above quite 
or almost, obsolete, cell-spot somewhat weakened. W. China: Tse-ku (type B), Ta-tsien-lu. Siao-lu, etc., ex coll. 
Oberthur. At Ichang intermediates occur between this and c. compositata. 
52. Genus: Encosmabraxas Prout 
(See Suppl.-Vol. 4, p. 107.) 
Palpus rather long, quite distinct from those of the two preceding genera. Areole simple, as in typical 
Galleulype. Discocellulars of hindwing not biangulate, in this respect nearer to Callabraxas. Type of the genus: 
placida Btlr .; this and the closely allied evanescens Btlr. are Japanese. In addition to them I refer here the 
following two yellow species. 
pseudo- E. pseudolargetaui Wehrli (Suppl.-Vol. 4, pi. 10 h). A truly remarkable mimic of the well-known Obeidia 
largetaui. l ar g e t au j Oberth. (Vol. 4, pi. 14 h), among which it was discovered. The deeper orange ground-colour and the 
more complex, more band-like formation of the black markings are its chief superficial distinctions from its 
model. Yunnan: Siaolu and Szechuan: Ta-tsien-lu. 
octoscripta. E. octoscripta Wileman (32 d). Closely related to pseudolargetaui (which is not impossibly a subspecies 
of it), but presenting a different aspect, chiefly on account of the confluence of the 4 costal bands of the fore¬ 
wing in the central part of the wing. Formosa: Arizan, only the type £ known. 
53. Genus: Chartograplia Gmpbg. 
In Vol. 4 I made this a section of Lygris, and as it differs in little except the different form of palpus 
longish-moderate, definitely not “long”, the terminal joint concealed this may be the better view, but 
