74 
MALARIA 
ern and western portions of its range are 
as follows: 
New YorTc: Bellport (H. D. and K.). Southern 
New York (Matheson 1929). Amaganset; Ft. 
Hamilton (quoted by Kiimm 1929). New York 
City (“M.B.” 1939). 
Massachusetts: Orleans (Tulloch 1939). 
Connecticut: Reported in State (Botsford and 
Turner 1933). 
Illinois: Herrin (Kumm). East Saint Louis 
(collected, 1937; notes from F. C. Bishopp). 
Kentucky: Mercer; McGee Springs; Louisville; 
Bardwell; East Bernstadt; Kent and Whiteley 
Counties (notes from Gt E. Quinby 1940). 
Oklahoma: Stillwater (Gaines Eddy coll., 
7/4/37). Muse (D. E. Howell 1940). Colgate (L. 
F Rozeboom 1940). 
Texas: Buena; Galveston; Tyler (H. D. and 
K.). Ft. Ringold; Leon Springs (Ludlow 1914). 
Dialville; Ellington Field; Ft. Crockett (quoted 
by Kumm 1929). Houston (Matthes 1935). 
Brownsville (Barber, Komp and King 1929); Sea- 
brook (CWA coll. 1934). 
New Mexico: Artesia, Pecos Valley (Barber 
1939). 
Anopheles hradleyi King 
Anopheles hradleyi King breeds in salt 
marshes and has almost the same distribu¬ 
tion as A. atropos along the Gulf and At¬ 
lantic coasts. The two species apparently 
do not often breed together, however, as 
hradleyi occurs in brackish water while 
atropos seems to prefer water of higher salt 
content. 
Locality records: King (1939) gave the known 
localities from which larvae of this form had been 
identified. These are as follows: Ocean City, Md.; 
Parris Island, S. C.; St. Johns River (Brevard 
County), Apalachee Bay, and various coastal locali¬ 
ties in Florida; Coden, Ala.; St. Bernard Parish, 
Buras, and Grand Bayou, La. Additional specific 
localities in Florida are the counties of St. Johns, 
Volusia, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie, Brow¬ 
ard, Dade, Manatee, and Hillsboro (collections by 
the writers). Vargas (1940) states that larvae of 
this form have been identified from saline pools in 
the State of Vera Cruz, Mexico. 
Anopheles georgianus King 
Anopheles georgianus King was first 
found by ft. E. Bellamy in fresh-water 
pools in Brooks County, Ga., and subse¬ 
quently was collected by him in Sumter, 
Terrell, and Thomas Counties (Bellamy 
1939). Material from several of these 
areas was examined by King (1939) in de¬ 
scribing the variety. No other records of 
its occurrence have been reported. 
Anopheles occidentals D. and K. and A. 
freehorni Aitken ( maculipennis 
auct.) 
Anopheles maculipennis has been re¬ 
corded from southern Canada and the 
northern part of the United States from 
Quebec, Maine, and Massachusetts west¬ 
ward, the Rocky Mountain region from 
southern New Mexico northward, and the 
Pacific Coast from Alaska, Yukon Terri¬ 
tory, and the Fraser Valley in British Co¬ 
lumbia to Baja California in Mexico. In 
California and Oregon freehorni, with the 
dark-tipped wing, is said to have the wider 
distribution, while occidentalis is said to be 
limited to a narrow strip along the coast 
from San Luis Obispo northward. The spe¬ 
cies occidentalis is the one that extends 
across southern Canada and the northern 
part of the United States, including also 
Nebraska and Iowa; the species freehorni 
extends into New Mexico and, according to 
Aitken (1941), occurs throughout the 
Rocky Mountain region west of the Divide 
as far north as Montana and possibly south¬ 
ern British Columbia, where the two are 
thought to overlap. Another species, azte- 
cus Hoffmann, is found in the high table 
lands of the Valley of Mexico. 
In some of the earlier work with Anophe¬ 
les maculipennis, specimens having a dark 
wing tip were identified as guadrimacula- 
tus, so the latter was probably credited 
erroneously to Utah, Montana, and Colo¬ 
rado (Howard, Dyar, and Knab 1917a). 
Locality records for Anopheles occiden¬ 
talis (based principally on the distribu¬ 
tional data or confirmed identifications, in¬ 
dicated by asterisks, as given by Aitken 
(1941). Most of the records, except those 
of Howard, Dyar, and Knab (1917a) and 
Aitken, were reported as maculipennis ). 
Alaska: Ft. Gibbon* (H. D. and K.). “Alaska” 
(Tulloch 1934). Gilmore (Tulloch specimens) and 
Anchorage (Aitken 1941). 
Yukon Territory: Hootalingua* (Dyar 1920). 
Valley of the Mayo River* (H. D. and K.). 
Northwest Territory: Aklavik and Fort McPher¬ 
son (Aitken 1941). 
British Columbia: Revelstoke* (H. D. and K.). 
Between Chilliwack and Mission, probably generally 
distributed in the lower Fraser Valley; south¬ 
ern Okanagan Valley (Hearle 1926, 1928). Sun- 
