DISTRIBUTION OP NEARCTIC SPECIES 
77 
Illinois: Chicago; Lemont; Beverly Hills; Palos 
Park (Gerhard 1910). Chicago; Urbana (H. D. 
and K.). Carbondale; Herrin; Murphysboro; 
Eock Island (quoted by Kumm). East Saint 
Louis (collected in 1937, notes from F. C. Bishopp). 
Des Plaines Valley (G. H. Bradley coll., July 
1938) . 
Minnesota: St. Paul and Savage (Howard, C. W. 
1916). Crystal Bay and Cedar Lake (Riley and 
Chalgren 1939 ?). Co mm on in south half but also 
found in northern plains section; not in coniferous 
forest (Owen 1937). 
North Dalcota: No anophelines recorded in list of 
mosquitoes taken at Fargo, Mandan, and Minot 
(Munro and Sangston 1939). 
South Dakota: Taken very frequently in eastern 
part of state (notes from H. C. Severin, 9/11/40). 
Iowa: Various localities in state (notes from 
C. J. Drake 1940, J. A. Rowe coll.). 
Missouri: Saint Louis (H. D. and K.). Pretty 
generally distributed over state (notes from L. 
Haseman 1940). Sikeston area (Ziegler and 
Maxey 1923). Lake of Ozarks (Johnson 1932). 
Kansas: Onaga (H. D. and K.). Fort Leaven¬ 
worth (quoted by Kumm). Burlington (Barber, 
Komp and Hayne). Areola; counties of Douglas, 
Doniphan, Riley and Pottawatomie (Hill 1939). 
Nebraska: Lincoln, 1903; Salt Creek, near Wav- 
erly, 1904 (notes from M. H. Swenk 1940). 
Oklahoma: Fort Gill (?Sill) and Fort Reno 
(quoted by Kumm). Stillwater (H. O. Schroeder 
coll., 1938). Page; Grove; Broken Bow; Flint; 
Sherwood; Hinton; Eagletown; Roff; Idabel; Sul¬ 
phur; Sallisaw; Gore; Sayre; Grandfield; Spavi- 
naw; Grant; Cheyenne; Cleo Springs; Muse; 
Wyandotte (notes from D. C. Howell 1940). 
Texas: Brazos River (Howard 1900). Dallas; 
Denison; Devils River; Kerrville; Paris (H. D. 
andK.). Galveston (Dyar 1922). Dialville; Leon 
Springs (quoted by Kumm). Del Rio (Barber, 
Komp and King 1929). Port Lavaca (CWA coll., 
1934, det. Stone). Menard . (H. C. Parish coll., 
1934, “abundant and annoying,” notes from F. 
C. Bishopp). Houston (Matthes 1935). Brazos 
County (Cushing 1936). Stephensville (P. T. 
Riherd coll., 5/30/39). South of El Paso (Barber 
1939) . Dallas (W. G. Bruce and E. W. Laake 
coll., 1940). 
New Mexico: Several localities in Pecos and 
Canadian River Valleys- (Barber, Komp and King 
1929; Barber and Forbrich 1933). 
Montana: Lolo (Mail 1934). 
California: Rarely taken south of the Tehachapi 
but is the predominating anopheline in the foothill 
sections and in limited foci along the Sacramento 
River (Freeborn 1926). Various localities (quoted 
by Kumm 1929). Inyo County (Aitken 1939). 
Oregon: Portland (H. D. and K.). Same distri¬ 
bution as maculipennis (Stage and Gjullin 1935,). 
Portland; 'Junction City; Buckeye Lake; Grants 
Pass; Sherwood; Independence; Harrisburg; Leba¬ 
non (notes from C. M. Gjullin and H. H. Stage 
1940) . 
Washington: Ashford (H. D. and K.). Taken 
in state (Stage and Gjullin 1935). Lake Tapps; 
Toppenish; Plaza; Vancouver; Yakima; Deming; 
Kalama (notes from C. M. Gjullin and H. H. Stage 
1940). 
Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say 
Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say ranges 
from New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and 
southern New York westward to southern 
Ontario, Minnesota, and Iowa, and through¬ 
out most of the southern territory to central 
Texas and Oklahoma. In the Southern 
States it is usually the predominant anophe¬ 
line. Few records are available as to its 
occurrence in most of the North-Central 
and Midwestern States, although its pres¬ 
ence may be assumed in areas where en¬ 
demic malaria is still found. 
Records for states where it is less com¬ 
mon or near the limits of its range are 
given below. In Massachusetts, Minnesota, 
Michigan, and Iowa 1 the species has been 
definitely shown (by identification based on 
male terminalie characters) to overlap the 
range of occidentalis. Overlapping prob¬ 
ably occurs also in other areas. Locality 
records for the northern and western parts 
of its range are as follows: 
New Hampshire: Center Harbor and Berlin Falls 
(H. D. and K.; probably occidentalis, in part). A 
male specimen from Center Harbor (“Isa. Sept. 6 
#114. H. G. Dyar Coll.”) has been identified re¬ 
cently by W. V. King as quadrimaculatus. Other 
specimens from this collection are listed as occi¬ 
dentalis by Aitken (1941). 
Massachusetts: Westfield and West Springfield 
(H. D. and K., possibly occidentalis). Found over¬ 
lapping quadrimaculatus in State (Freeborn 1923). 
Scituate (F. C. Bishopp and G. H. Bradley coll., 
9/12/32). 
Connecticut: Pine Orchard (H. D. and K.). 
Mystic (F. C. Bishopp and G. H. Bradley coll., 
9/12/32). 
New York: Ithaca; Bellport; Bayside, Long 
Island (H. D. and K.). Central New York (Mathe- 
son and Shannon 1923; Matheson 1929). New 
York City. (“M.B.” 1939). (Various other locali¬ 
ties listed'by Kumm, Felt, etc., questionable as to 
exact identification). 
Ontario: Cayuga (notes from R. M. Matheson, 
also E. H. Hinman 1940). 
Pennsylvania: West Fairview (H. D. and K.). 
i Through the kindness of C. J. Drake, fe<J£>rds 
from a recent survey of Iowa made by J. A. Rowe 
were furnished the writers in advance of publica¬ 
tion. 
