TABLE 5. COMPARISON OF MEAN OBSERVED CONDITION SCORES IN OYSTERS PLANTED 
IN CHESTER RIVER* __ 
G 
o 
•H 
-p 
fT3 
■p 
CO 
rH 
rH 
00 
CD 
CD 
o< 
ct\ 
0 
ro 
CM 
O’ 
in 
r- 
O' 
p 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
-p 
ro 
ro 
ro 
ro 
ro 
ro 
c 
o 
u 
rH 
CD 
• 
00 • 
cn rH 
in • 
00 o 
o 
O’ 
01 
rH in 
on o 
cp co 
CD O 
rH 
• • 
• • 
ro 
2 
ro 2 
CM o 
ro 2 
o' o 
-- 
-- 
+ 
-- 
- 
.—x 
,—■* 
rH 
in 
• 
ro • 
in • 
rH in 
ro o 
CM 
CO 
CM CO 
00 CO 
CM O 
oo o 
cp 
• • 
• • 
ro 
ro 2 
<o 2 
ro o 
O' O 
'— 
— 
+• —- 
- - 
rH 
rH 
rH 
• 
00 • 
ro o 
r- 
00 iH 
uo o 
rH 
CO 
ro CO 
ro o 
CM o 
C' o 
r- o 
00 
ro 
2 
ro 2 
•O' o 
O' O 
O' o 
O O 
'—’ 
--- 
1 — 1 
'—’ 
1 ■ 
' ' 
rH 
•H 
O' O 
ro • 
ro • 
■O' o 
ro o 
oo co 
CD CO 
r- o 
o' o 
ro 2 
ro 2 
O’ o 
s * 
'' **’ 
^^ 
• 
m • 
O’ • 
ro • 
r- • 
o 
CO 
CO CO 
r- co 
r- co 
CD CO 
CD 
• 
• 
ro 
ro 2 
ro 2 
co 2 
ro 2 
' s “^ 
"" *” 
# __ 
00 • 
CD CO 
• • 
ro 2 
'' ^ 
4 __ 
4 __ 
rH 
• 
oo in 
<T« • 
rH • 
o • 
CM • 
o 
CO 
CD o 
r- co 
CO CO 
CO CO 
o' co 
o' 
ro 
2 
ro o 
ro 2 
ro 2 
ro 2 
ro 2 
" * 
V * 
N ^ 
' ** 
^^ 
ro 
• 
o • 
CM • 
00 • 
CD • 
ro 
CO 
CM CO 
r- co 
uo co 
O CO 
ro 
• 
• 
• • 
ro 
2 
ro 2 
ro 2 
ro 2 
o’ 2 
" 
' ' 
' ’ 
„_ N 
ro 
• 
00 • 
m • 
ro 
co 
rH CO 
in co 
CM 
• 
• 
• • 
• • 
ro 
2 
ro 2 
ro 2 
V ’ 
-P 
CO 
CD 
cu 
0 
>i 
p 
G 
G 
G 
rH 
Cp 
rd 
P 
P 
P 
P 
P 
S 
P) 
•"3 
•o 
< 
ro 
CM 
O' 
r- 
CM 
m 
CM 
rH 
CM 
rH 
I 
-p 
G 
rd 
0 
•H 
mh 
•H 
G 
CP 
• 
•H l 
uo 
co 
o 
• 
p 
o 
<D 
ip 
G 
ip 
rd 
•H rG 
Ti 
■P 
-p 
P 
0 
0 
G 
CP 
P 
0 
0 
»0 rH 
CO 
in 
G 
0 
rd 
P 
0 
rH 
£ 
0 
> 
<u 
CO 
>1 
0 
-P 
.c 
•H 
-p 
rH 
•H 
-p 
a 
rd 
rd 
.G 
A 
-P 
0 
P 
co 
CU 
<1) 
•H 
0 
-P 
0 
•H 
-P 
rH 
•H 
u 
Xi 
•H 
rd 
TS 
.Q 
C 
0 
•H 
P 
CU 
• 
c n 
0 
• 
P 
rd 
CO 
• 
0 
CO 
co 
G 
0 
0 
.G 
0 
-P 
e 
G 
0 
rH 
P 
0 
0 
p 
CU 
-p 
G 
G 
0 
•H 
O 
CO 
e 
P 
0 
0 
p 
rQ 
mh 
P 
2 
rH 
* 
• 
CD 
P 
H 
rd 
> 
o 
p 
-p 
g 
o 
u 
c 
rd 
£ 
-p 
p 
0 
2 
o 
>1 
r—I 
-P 
c 
rd 
u 
•H 
4H 
•H 
a 
Cp 
•H 
CO 
CO 
0 
3 
i—I 
rd 
> 
4 - 
27 
