<A 
O 
3 
T3 
O 
£ 
o 
w 
(0 
v 
(A 
a> 
oc 
lU 
UJ 
X 
z 
-I 
<0 
O M 
C d) 
CD M 
<0 « 
=5 ™ 
~ <0 
« O) 
o i 
e- o 
8 1 
c o 
Z E 
O <]) 
11 
ii 
<0 .5 
0) 
■g 
■> 
p 
c» 
c 
CO 
o 
CO 
•D 
c 
(D 
CO 
o 
CO 
0) 
iS 
CO 
c 
‘c 
o 
Q. 
a 
3 
<0 0) 
o 
</) 
(0 
a> 
o 
o 
(0 
o 
CO 
o 
CO 
c 
•i i 
m 
§3 
o E 
1 ^ 
(0 d) 
•S -Q 
1 2 
5 a 
d) >- 
E o 
2 d) 
r E 
(0 d> 
3 x: 
o o 
8 E 
O S 
I s 
O « 
<D C 
E 2 
<Q 0) 
O 
*0 
*> 
p 
a> 
a> 
(0 
c 
<0 
E 
C ■D 
•B S 
S « 
"O 
■« s 
0) <5 
c to 
T) W 
3 (0 
O o 
c « 
■” "D 
in c 
tn to 
§- 
2 o 
it w 
o *- 
c o 
I- 
1 § 
B 3 
8 0) 
<0 
C 3 
■g a 
“1 
CO a> 
CD d) 
S < -D 
9 
(0 
0. 
o 
r: 
o 
(0 
0) 
o 
*D 
O 
E 
■D 
C 
o 
_ </) 
«s 
0) (0 
It 
(0 
c 
4) 
o 
Q. 
0) 
c» g 
0) .2 
"S 
3 
3 
*- X 
C o 
o c 
E 
o 
<0 
> 
o 
in Q 
a c 
(0 
"O 
c 
0) 
<c 
2 E 
a> ® 
*D 
O 
o 
</) 
LL 
E 
3 
^ 8 
•Q 
s 
’r E 
C 
(Q 
o 
® d) 
<0 
c 
£ -c 
o ® 
•D 
O 
o 
E - 
S X 
2 o 
O 
E 
IS 
o 
o 
■I B 8 o 
tn ^ 
in 
O 
= !2 
°» ® 
T3 _to 
d> O 
•o ._ 
> O 
P to 
0. E 
o C 
to i 
1 I 
c» o 
o8 o 
in “= 
9? ®- 
< in 
B 5 § 
8 I c 
M O 
T3 
d) 
■g 
■> 
o 
S 
d) 
c 
<0 — 
o o 
(/) <0 
(0 (0 
_ 2 2 
0. CO 
<0 O 
<0 
° I 
C3 E 
10 « 
ri © 
o w 
c ® 
o 
~ o -e w 
m St 
E 8 
g> 
c <0 
o o 
o *D 
is o> 
O c 
■S 2 
o c 
£ o 
E ^ 
^ O) 
<D C 
2 TJ 
> 3 
2 o 
0- £ 
(0 
c 
<0 
>» 
4-» 
_c 
10 
•C w 
® c 
s ® 
E 
3 
O 
o 
ID 
2 
o 
e- 
§ «> 
.£ (D 
O % 
c 
3 
■o 
c ^ 
<0 -Q 
1 § 
§1 
in 3 
c O) 
B CO 
10 
2 2 
w Q. 
£ < 
* Q. 
W Q. 
© <0 
"O d> 
O > 
.2 ^ 
« 2 
I - 
^ C 
I s 
> d) 
® ^ 
a S 
c o 
.2 M 
•s ® 
.2 ® 
*0 ® M 
d> iS c 
E U 5 
a o ^ 
in 
_i c 
o o 
O 
(0 
c 
o 
JZ 
O) 
ro 
0) 
0. 
X 
c 
g 
c5 
m 
0) 
k. 
o 
c 
w 
0) 
0) 
w 
k. 
X 
3 
o 
c 
o 
® u> 
© <0 
■o a 
d> “■ 
£ 
in 
d> 
(0 
$ 
145 
Figure 14. Relationship between current stages of State/Tribal assessment, TMDL and watershed restoration planning processes, and 
proposed combined path. 
