A-59 
Dilie JA. 2003. How good is your weed map? A comparison of spatial interpolators. Weed 
Science 51:44-55. 
Gotway, CA. 1994. The Use of Conditional Simulation in Nuclear Waste-Site Performance 
Assessment. Technomctrics 36:2:129-141. 
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. New York: Chapman and Hall 
p335. 
Jensen OP, Christman MC, Miller TJ. 2006. Landscape-based geostatistics: A case study of 
the distribution of blue crab in Chesapeake Bay. Environmetrics 17:605-621. 
Joumel A. 1974. Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies. Economic Geology 
69:673-687. 
Kitanidis PK. 1997. Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology. New York: 
Cambridge University Press. 271 p. 
Kravchenko AN. 2003. Influence of Spatial Structure on Accuracy of Interpolation Methods. 
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1564-1571. 
Kutner MH. Nachtsheim CJ. Neter J, Li W. 2004. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5 th 
edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 
Laslett GM. 1994. Kriging and splines: an empirical comparison of their predictive perform¬ 
ance in some applications. JASA 89:391-400. 
Lloyd CD. 2005. Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of 
monthly precipitation in Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology 308:128-150. 
Ouyang Y, Zhang JE, Ou LT. 2006. Temporal and spatial distributions of sediment total 
organic carbon in an estuary river. J. Environmental Quality. 35:93-100 
Rcinstorf F.Binder M, Schirmer M, Grimm-Strele J, Walther W. 2005. Comparative assess¬ 
ment of regionalization methods of monitored atmospheric deposition loads. Atmospheric 
Environment 39:3661-3674. 
Ribeiro PJ, Diggle PJ. 2001. geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. R News 1:2:15-18. 
Schabenbcrger O, Gotway CA. 2005. Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis. 
Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. 512 p. 
Spokas K, Graff C, Morcet M, Aran C. 2003. Implications of the spatial variability of land¬ 
fill emission rates on geospatial analyses. Waste Management 23:599-607. 
Sullivan PJ, Acheson J, Angermeier PL, Faast T, Flemma J, Jones CM, Knudsen EE, Minello 
TJ, Secor DH, Wunderlich R, Zanatell BA. 2006. Defining and implementing best available 
science for fisheries and environmental science, policy and management. Bethesda, Md: 
American Fisheries Society and Port Republic, Md. Estuarine Research Federation. Port 
Republic, Maryland, (available: www.fisheries.org/AFSmontana/AFS.ERF.BestScicnce.pdf) 
Tomczak, M. 1998. Spatial interpolation and its uncertainty using automated anisotropic 
inverse distance weighting (IDW) - cross-validation/jackknife approach. J. Geog. Infor. and 
Decision Analysis 2:18-30. 
[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency (US). 2003. Technical support documentation for 
identification of Chesapeake Bay designated uses and attainability. Annapolis (MD): EPA. 
177 p. EPA 903-R-03-002. (Available: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/search/pubs.htm) 
Valley RD.Drake MT.Anderson CS. 2005. Evaluation of alternative interpolation techniques 
for the mapping of remotely-sensed submersed vegetation abundance. Aquatic Botany 81:13- 
25. 
appendix a 
The Cumulative Frequency Diagram Method for Determining Water Quality Attainment 
