Table 4. Diagnostic assessment of benthic community degradation for random sites sampled within Chesapeake Bay seg- 
K-20 
appendix k 
on 
"to g 
° t 
0 ) o 
J: u 
a. 
c 3 
o 
<u £ 
ui C 
S i ^ 
to 
•E c 
3 3 
8 a> 
i/> JO 
_ 
- .£ 
00 Q. 
c IE 
m >/> 
£ * 
E jo 
<L E 
ji a> 
~ E 
TO O 
C >, 
C ~ 
$ jo 
0; ro 
£ o 
CL 
s - 
o o 
rsi - 
o OJ 
O v/i 
O O 
CM Q_ 
TO C 
O TO 
C a> 
* * 
a> 
> a> 
U) 
'J' is) ru 
Q; 
u c 
wS s 
C L- 
£ 
g 5 ii 
o ^ 
4— <D -4-* 
6 E 3 
o s 
■*- TJ $ 
i/l (D 
.2 T3 vo 
q. <0 2 
E o' c 
to g 
— ^ jo 
IS Ci *- 
o . o 
o a, 
a> ici u 
^5 
° A = 
flj 3 
cn 2--Q 
to V rc 
C w c 
3.2.1 
« E£ 
Q. qj m- 
to E 3 
c 
TO 
a.E 
o ■£ 
^ "O 
O Qj 
h- 
i/> V 
4-* <L> 
C = 
a> o 
u 
rr> ^ 
S’* 
Q. 
-Q E 
to 
J2 
E 
3 
C 
E w — 
C .. m 
TO i_ ._ 
-2 
TO +£. l/l 
k- C m 
cn to — 
<U C 2- 
TO E E 
**— c TO *■ 
o TO m * 
w 4— 1 
(U C “D 
Dl O ■ 
TO O TO 
tr M- jo ■ 
S°D 
u >1 a> 
jo m 
i_' TO 
S-g-g 
ql ^ • 
v/^ 
03 
“O 
<u 
CO 
_ro 
u 
a; 
w- 
4J 
§ 
o 
JO 
c 
<u 
E 
ai 
a; 
oo 
d. 
3 
O 
k. 
oo 
♦-» 
c 
TO 
C 
E 
TO 
■4— 1 
c 
o 
u 
QJ 
JC 
TO 
QJ 
’ i/l 
>. 
JO 
k- 
JO O 
3 
i/i i/i 
<- TO ■’> 0) 
o c 5 2 
TO (/I £ 
- V -o 
9- c 
TO 
c 
a; 
12 JO 
II 
JO 
o 
3 
TO -Q 
oi TO 
O 
IC _Q 
<D 
11 
ro ro 
ia Q_ 
h- p 
o .E 
<D 
> 
s 
c5 
x 
I 
u 
■8 
a> 
> 
C/5 
P 
• 2006 303(d) Assessment Methods for Chesapeake Bay Benthos 
