cooying the data foe my resords until the plants ware ready to go into the 
Olub herb.Ha has not realized ihis^and has sent ms the id ratifications merely 
with reference to the number of my collection.Oenarally this has been all right 
for I have^found the things among my others to be worked up in £. 8 . 62 .But one 
year ha apparently did something elss with them,for I have a lot of numbers 
for things which I have not found there,and some of them are things sufficient¬ 
ly rare so that I want to have them in the flora.I have,you see,his identifica¬ 
tion and the number of the collection,but not the place and the date,so that I 
cannot cite them.Sow it has occurred to me that they may have got into the 
things to be mounted for the Olub Herbarium and may be already distributed in 
the cases.If so it would not be hard to find them.I am not going to enclose the 
whole list for some of them are things not important enough to spend time lookis 
A 
for,but merely give those which,on account of their infrequency in the county, 
I especially want to have. 
17271 gad 17272 Myriophyllum verticillaturn , 
17270 Potamogeton alpinus 
17280 Myriophyllum alt emit jorum 
17109 iqgisetam ptafcense 
1718b Potamogeton smpltfolius 
v 17186 " pusillus 
17851 Artemisia Absinthium 
17553 Els ocharis olivacea 
17555 Aster longifolius v.villiceulis 
----—- J ---— 
17588 Panioum macrocaroon 
fa 16905 Rubus idaeus ,v. atrigosus ,f. tonsus 
fa 17324 Salix nigra 
/ 17351 and 17355 OtrioalariB int ermedia 
fa 17344 Pali am 'ooreale 
/17366 Oarex crinita x torta 
v. 
pectinatam 
/ 18153 Eu 0 horbia gly p 1 0 sp e r m a 
If you should find any of these in their olaces just writs after the name the 
township and the year^in the case of aquatics the pond also)and Let me have it. 
I should suggest that you do not speak to M.L.E.about it,for I would not hays 
him think that they got misiiid in this way,and also I think that Moors may 
perhaps have bothered him a little about the last half dozen on this list once 
before.The first ones,however,have not been searched for,I am sure.There are 
two additions to the county flora on the list so you see wb/y I am desirous not 
to lose them) 
I should be also very glad to know how the recent revisions have affected 
two specimens which I had called Oarex laxifloea : Stratford,no. 15523( 1912) 
Berlin, no. 16125(1914) 
They will probably be either in 0.oemosbachya or 0.blanda. 
And how my Stigma oernaa^ Cand varieties now stand after Wisgand has revi¬ 
sed them.I don’t want you to work them out,bub if he has visaed and labelled 
