that the do fas which are found 
motion of Geor. a t ? 
Lnmpkia killed the doves In ejection are not ? *3ewsalag*‘ doves. Jttae of the 
defendants in #omw®ati«a with the prosecuting attorney at Athens claimed 
that they were •'psetjHt® doves, others said that tfcsy were *’blu©« doves. Son© 
of Wm defendants Ao entered pleas of guilty would he eatl©factory witnesses 
to prove that the dowse hilled by JmqfcXn t?er# nw&ming* ■ doves • 
She aesstfem of the United states Court at Athens sill owxwm oa¬ 
ths 2nd Monday is April, sad it Is Important that the prosecution have 
evidence available at that tin® to prove that tho dotes killed by 'josses. 
I :A» were "raoornin, .uo, 
such 
V 
Wmmtom* -;t will thank you to canoe 
ho necessary to procure competent evident# to establish this fast 
at that tews of the court. 
In the event it should he found that the doves killed try Joseph H» 
ims&dn wore sot burning’’ doves, 'mi were another Mud of doves coning 
within the description of migratory birds sot forth in Article I, subsection 
1 (aI- of the Convention between the United State Great Britain for the 
■ v.-f ' J ' '. 9 • ’ • -y &?;_ ’:- - 
.protection of Moratory birds in the United 3tate@ and Qanada (39 Stat*, 1702), 
it would he advisable to institute a prosecution alleging . killing of the 
particular kind of dove shorn by the evidence to liave hog® killed hy the accused. 
In the event It should become accessary to institute another prosecution‘ 
in this case, please advise whether prosecution by information would he satisfactory 
to your Bepartsaont without again submitting the os to the Grand Jury. 
lespeotfuHy, 
... p J. ®* Henley, 
Assistant United States Attorney. 
