PY CN OGON IDA—CALM AN. 
49 
spinosum, Montagu. The fact that Schimkewitsch (1913, p. (505) has discovered a 
type-specimen of Encleis didactyla and has identified it with Dohrn’s Amt not hen 
inaqnirostris only proves that Philippi’s generic diagnosis, upon which Loman lays 
stress, agrees with neither of the species upon which it was based. 
Endeis australis (Hodgson) (Text-fig. 1 1). 
Phoxichilus australis, Hodgson, 1907, p. 5, PL 1, fig. 1 ; Bouvier, 1913, p. 118, text-fig. 74. 
Occurrence .—Station 220, off Cape Adare, 45-50 
fathoms; 1 ?. Station 314, McMurdo Sound, 
222-241 fathoms; I <£,2$. Station 338, Entrance 
to McMurdo Sound, 207 fathoms; 1 Station 340, 
off Granite Harbour, 160 fathoms; 2 $. Station 355, 
McMurdo Sound, 300 fathoms ; I $. 
Remarks. —To the descriptions of this species by 
Hodgson and by Bouvier it may be added that a 
pair of small tubercles, more prominent in some 
specimens than in others, are present on the anterior 
margin of the cephalon above the base of the 
proboscis (Fig. 11). These tubercles appear to cor¬ 
respond to those regarded by Dohrn as vestiges of 
the chelophores. The orifices of the cement-glands 
described by Bouvier cannot be discerned in either 
of the males in this collection, possibly owing 
to the specimens not being fully mature. 
Fig. 11. —Endeis australis (Hodgson). 
Dorsal view of cephalic segment 
and proboscis of specimen showing 
well-developed cephalic tubercles. 
Genus AMMOTHEA, Leach. 
Ammothea, Leach, 1814, p. 33. 
Leionymplion, Mobius, 1902, p. 183. 
I have elsewhere (1915a) re-described the holotype of Leach’s Ammothea 
carolinensis, with which I have attempted to show that Pfeifer’s A. y rand is is identical. 
Bouvier (1913, p. 122) includes, among the characters distinguishing this genus 
from Achelia, “pas de sail lie ce'mentaire femorale.” While it is true that there is no 
conspicuous prominence as in Achelia , the opening of the femoral cement-gland is very 
distinct, at a little distance from the end of the femur on the dorsal surface, and in 
A. meridionalis it is elevated on a gentle swelling visible in side view (Fig. 12, C and 
D, p. 54). Bouvier also, in his key, distinguishes Ammothella from Ammothea only 
by the Inarticulate scape of the chelophores, but as he includes in Ammothella, the 
Achelia hispida of Hodge, which has an unjointed scape, it might be better to use for 
this purpose the transverse ridges of the trunk somites, which are very distinct in all 
the species of the present genus. 
VOL. III. JJ 
