PYCNOGONTD A- CALMAN. 
21 
Width between first and second lateral 
“ Terra 
Stn. 194. 
8 
Nova.” 
“ Discovery. 
Stn. 338. Holotype. 
? ? ‘ 
processes ...... 
2 ■ 25 
3-0 2-25 
Width across second lateral processes . 
7-3 
8-5 6-0 
Length of abdomen . . . . 
o 
3-25 
3 ’ 7 5 2 • 7 5 
Third right leg— 
o o 
Coxse ...... 
G ‘ 5 
7-25 6'0 
Femur ...... 
26-0 
33-0 21-0 
First tibia ...... 
24-5 
left 22-0 
31-0 21*5 
Second tibia ..... 
22-5 
left 20-0 
29-0 16-0 
1 arsus ...... 
9'2 
11-0 7-0 
Propodus ...... 
5 • 75 
6-0 4-75 
Claw....... 
3'75 
2'5 
Palp 
Second segment ..... 
6'0 
4-2 
Third ,, 
•96 
•68 
Fourth ., 
4-4 
2-88 
Fifth „. 
1-68 
1-12 
Sixth 
2-08 
1-6 
Seventh ,, 
1 -6 
1 • 12 
Eighth ,, 
1 '44 
1 • 12 
Ninth ,, 
1-6 
1 • 12 
R 
cernui 
ks, 
According to the 
O 
original description of this species the femur should 
be slightly shorter than the first tibia. This, however, is not always the case ; even in 
a specimen labelled by Mr. Hodgson as “ type,” and here selected as holotype, the 
femur is a little longer than the tibia in the left leg, although shorter than it in the 
right leg of the third pair (see measurements above). 
The smaller of the specimens in the “Terra Nova” collection do not differ in any 
important respect from the holotype. In particular, they agree with it in having only 
a median row of minute setrn on the dorsal surface of the trunk. The two largest 
specimens, however, of which measurements are given above, have the whole dorsal 
surface rough with short setse and the legs rather more spiny. The general agreement 
in other respects leads me to regard these as only a spinose form of <'. f/laciali*. The 
great length of the legs in the female from Station 338 is noteworthy. 
It seems very likely that Bouvier’s C. </rac'dij>es will prove to be identical with 
this species. Almost the only definite characters in which they appear to diverge, 
according to Bouvier’s account, are (1) the form of the proboscis, which in (tjrocilipes 
