CRUSTACEA DECAPOD A—BORE AI > AT LE. 
S3 
L. reynaudi. I would point out, however, that the differences between these species 
have not yet been wholly disposed of. Bate’s specimens, which are quite faithfully 
represented by the figure in the “Challenger” Report, still fail to agree with Kemp’s 
redescription (Linn. Trans. Inc. clt.) of Dana’s species. In them the last leg does not 
nearly reach the end of the neck, and the latter is from once and three-quarters to 
more than twice as long as the rest of the cephalothorax. Tlie size of the specimens 
makes it impossible for these discrepancies to be due to differences in age, but it is 
quite possible that they may be accounted for by variation. In any case, however, the 
matter needs further investigation. 
Numerous specimens of L. hotel were taken by the Expedition at Stations 45, 40, d 
47, 50, 53, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68^Ld 126. 3//( c rt S3 2LJ Zj. 3Z'f-l 
10. Leucifer faxoni, Borr., 1915. 
Lucifer typus?, Faxon, Stud. Chesapeake Zool. Lab. Sci. Res. 1878 (1879). 
Lucifer sp., Brooks, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 1882, I., p. 87, pi. VII. 
Lucifer faxoni, Borradaile, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), XVI, p. 228 (1915). 
Specimens taken in the sub-tropical Atlantic by the Expedition evidently belong 
to the species described by Faxon and Brooks from more northerly waters of the same 
ocean. 
Twelve specimens were taken at Stations 39, 40. / f'j./.ZfZZ-Sl 
11. Leucifer hanseni, Nobili, 1905. 
Lucifer lianseni, Nobili, Bull. Mus. Paris, 1905, p. 394; Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. (9), I V, p. 25, 
pi. IT., fig. 1, and text-fig. 3b (1906); Kemp, Mem. Ind. Mus. V., p. 324, text-fig. 37a 
(1915). 
Lucifer inermis, Borradaile, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), XVI, p. 229 (1915). 
1 regret to have altogether overlooked Nobili’s papers in my recent enumeration 
of the species of Leucifer. 
Numerous specimens were taken in Melbourne Harbour. $"/ ($ / / (j j f /, ff'-j frf- , 
Tribe CARIDES. 
Family PASIPHAEIDAE. 
12. Paslphaea longi-spina, Lenz and Strunck, 1914. 
Pasiphaea longispina, Lenz and Strunck, Deutsche Siklpolar Exp. XV, iii, p. 315, pi. XIX. 
Lenz and Strunck’s specimen was damaged. Those which were taken by the 
“ Terra Nova ” enable me to add the following facts to the German authors’ description. 
The rostrum slightly outreaches the eye, and has a sharp, downwardly hooked tip. 
The length, in the mid-dorsal line, of the sixth abdominal segment equals that of the 
telson, and is twice that of the second segment. The sixth segment has no spine 
behind. The telson is little shorter than the sharp-tipped endopodite, and a good deal 
shorter than the round-ended exopodite of the uropod. Its dorsal surface is deeply 
N 
