92 
BLEPHARITA — Key-Table for reference to species enumerated in Volume 3 and this Supplement. 
46. Genus: Hlepharita Hmps. 
■ussuriensis. B. arnica Tr. (Vol. 3, p. 66, pi. 15 e). — ussuriensis Shelj. is a larger race with intensively red-brown 
forewings and paler rather reddish grey hindwings. This east asiatic race varies considerably from the more 
western specimens. From the S. Ussuri (Sutshan). 
leuconota. B. leuconota H.-S. (= stigmatica Gn.) (14 c) was omitted in Main Volume. Hampson classified same 
in the Genus Anytus. More recently, for instance Zerny, places same in the Genus Blepharita and my 
opinion is also that it is better inserted here. Forewings brownish grey with reddish to fuscous hue, a long 
heavy black basal streak below the cell. Transverse lines dentate with whitish edges on averted sides. Orbicular 
stigma somewhat obliquely oval. Reniform stigma widely white in outer half. A few sagittate marks before the 
dentate subterminal line. Marginal area, except for centre, very dusky. Both transverse lines are more or less 
distinctly conjoined by black along the submedian fold. Hindwings whitish with discal spot, a postmedian 
band is indicated. Veins shaded in subterminal region, more heavily so in $. S. Russia, Armenia, Asia 
trisignata. Minor, Syria. — trisignata Men. does not appear to vary much from the specimens submitted to me. Per¬ 
haps they are slightly more reddish brown, the white of the reniform stigma slightly condensed. Pontus, Taurus 
immaculata. to Ferghana. — inunaculata Schaus. reniform stigma is brown and not white. Described from Haifa (Syria). 
nasamo- B. nasamonius Trti. (14 c). This very closely resembles the preceding species, but in the male sex 
nius. the pectinations of antennae are distinctly longer and hindwings are a much deeper shade of grey-brown. Fore¬ 
wings with deep brown colouration, having a carmine hue, as for instance Eumichtis porphyrea Esp. The reniform 
stigma, which is very prominent is smaller and pure white, the black mark that conjoins claviform stigma 
and posterior transverse stripe is much wider and forms a rectangle. The other markings are just like those 
of leuconota. The hind tibiae have 2—3 spurs outwardly. From Cyrenaica. This species almost looks exactly 
like a pale solieri, but the latter has no tibia! spurs. 
Key-Table 
for facilitating reference to the species dealt with in Volume 3 and this Supplement. 
Volume 3 
Supplement 
Volume 3 
Supplement 
page 
page 
page 
page 
accipiter 
63 
89 
bonza 
47 
62 
acetosellae 
62 
89 
brunnea (Euxoa) 
24 
45 
acuminifera 
28 
25 
brunnea (Rbyacia) 
45 
76 
adumbrata 
28 
32 
brunneago 
59 
84 
aequicuspis 
36 
56 
brunnescens 
56 
76 
agalma 
48 
61 
agathina 
64 
91 
caelebs 
60 
88 
ala 
55 
66 
caecimacula 
61 
88 
alaina 
51 
67 
canariensis 
28 
28 
albifurca 
48 
61 
candelarum 
52 
72 
albipennis 
45 
63 
candelisequa 
54 
73 
albuncula 
59 
85 
Candida 
55 
67 
alpestris 
54 
73 
capnistis 
4S 
60 
alpigena 
27 
48 
caradrinoides 
55 
66 
alpicola 
36 
74 
carthalina 
24 
24 
arnica 
66 
92 
castanea 
39 
81 
amoena 
34 
38 
cecilia 
57 
62 
anachoreta 
50 
81 
celebrata 
34 
58 
anarmodia 
26 
51 
celsicola 
35 
55 
antiqua 
58 
83 
centralis 
31 
37 
aquilina 
32 
26 
cbaldaica 
53 
64 
arenosa (Euxoa) 
33 
43 
chalybeata 
57 
62 
arenosa (Hermonassa) 
57 
62 
characteristica 
26 
46 
argillacea 
58 
80 
cbardinyi 
64 
91 
armena (= deserta!) 
28 
26 
chretieni 
25 
24 
ashworthii 
52 
72 
christophi 
27 
25 
asella 
51 
71 
cinerea 
27 
48 
atlantica 
42 
90 
cissigma 
38 
63 
aucta 
49 
69 
clara 
34 
59 
augur 
49 
82 
clarivena 
39 
63 
clauda 
29 
42 
baetica 
24 
43 
clava 
57 
62 
baja 
44 
77 
c-nigrum 
43 
79 
basigramma 
33 
37 
cognita 
28 
66 
basistriga 
46 
76 
collina 
47 
65 
bifurca 
25 
48 
comes 
42 
90 
bipartita 
51 
82 
comma 
509 
91 
birivia 
29 
31 
confinis 
49 
69 
bogdanovi 
28 
38 
confusa (subconspicua) 
29 
36 
bombycia 
25 
47 
consanguinea 
44 
79 
