164 
HETEROGRAPHA-SCYTHOCENTROPUS. By Dr. M. Dratjdt. 
necessary to go into matters further to establish the question of identity. It seems quite possible to me that 
oberthuri and orenburghensis are conspecific. 
glaisi. S. glaisi Luc. appears to very closely resemble the group of fissipuncta-obertlnuri species, just discussed. 
Forewings very pale brownish grey, very monotonous, only the dark triangular spot between the orbicular 
and reniform stigmata is distinct. Both transverse lines are barely visible, subterminal line slightly more distinct. 
The ^ is rather more clearly marked and a shade darker. Hindwings brownish grey with widely dark marginal 
area. Size is not indicated. Algeria (Sidi bel Abbes), in August. 
judaica. S. judaica Stgr. (Vol. 3, p. 179, pi. 41 d). The illustration was unrecognisable, a better one of this species 
from Palestine is now given (20 b). 
17. Genus: Heterographa Stgr. 
fabrilis. H. fabrilis Pglr. (20 b) is very similar to zelleri and puengeleri. Forewings are paler, the black costal 
markings fainter, all markings slightly less distinct. Orbicular stigma larger; reniform stigma paler, less con¬ 
stricted, the blackish dusting in cell fainter, a black inner marginal spot at base. The posterior transverse line 
is almost straight, nearer to reniform stigma. The black longitudinal streaks in subterminal shade are absent. 
Hindwings white, outwardly grey with bolder central lunule. Kuldja, Ili territory. 
20. Genus: £cl>oleiuia Hmps. 
misella. E. misella Pglr. (Vol. 3, p. 181). We are now able to illustrate this species (20 b) from a specimen from 
the Pungeler collection. 
21. Genus: Margelana Stgr. 
flavidior. M. flavidior Wgnr. (20 b) has markings identically the same as M. versicolor, but forewings are pale 
canary-yellow. The sinuate marginal line of versicolor , that extends parallel to margin, is in this case straight 
and proceeds direct to apex of forewings. Hindwings pure white. Also differing on underside by the almost 
pure white colouration without any darker shading, such as in versicolor. From Akshehir, in September. 
discrepans. M. discrepans Stgr. (Vol. 3, p. 181, pi. 41 1). The illustration in Main Volume gives no conception of 
this brownish species and we are giving a better picture here (20 c). 
veternosa. M. veternosa Pglr. (Vol. 3, p. 181). We are now able to give an illustration of this rare species (20 c), 
from Askhabad. 
21a. Genus: Heptapotamfa Alph. 
This Genus, that was omitted from Main Volume, is apparently very close to the Genus Margelana, 
according to information supplied by Filipjev, who has examined the types in the Museum at Leningrad. 
However in the original description it was stated expressly that the eyes were ciliated (“oculis circumciliatis”). 
Antennae as in Ulochlaena i. e. with long bipectinations. Thorax and sides of abdomen with long and dense 
hairs. Palpi straight and porrect, with long hairs on underside. Had it not been for Filipjev’s remarks, I 
would have placed this moth near Derthisa among the Gucullianae. Only 1 species: 
eusiratii. H. eustratii Alph. Forewings faintly glossy yellow-grey. Central area between the transverse lines 
somewhat darker. Basal area yellowish white, submarginal area similarly paler. Anterior transverse line com¬ 
mences at costa in a bold spot and forms 2 basally concave arcs to inner margin. The dentate outer transverse 
line is only faintly curved, both lines pure white, as is also the large reniform stigma. Orbicular stigma is puncti- 
form. The extremely long grey fringes are checked with white on veins. Hindwings pure white. Wing expanse: 
37 mm. Arganaty (Semiretshje). 
22. Genus: Eremopola Warr. 
This Genus is a typical Cucullianae and was already referred to on p. 150 of this Supplement. The 
remaining species are somewhat doubtful in regard to their classification here and require further elucidation. 
We are enumerating them meanwhile under Margelana , where both Hampson and Pungeler had placed them. 
23. Genus: Gentropodia Hmps. 
This Genus must be re-named: Scythoeeritropus Speis. as Centropodia was only introduced 6 years later. 
C. inquinata Mab. (Vol. 3, p. 182). We are now illustrating this species (20 c) that is distributed 
inquinata. 
