List of Figures 
Figure 3.1.1. Views of field sampling activities during the 2002 NCA Intertidal 
Assessment in Oregon (A), Washington (B,D) and California (C).13 
Figure 3.1.2. Percentage area of habitat types for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal 
Assessment.14 
Figure 3.1.3. Distribution of sampling stations in Washington and Oregon for the 2002 
West Coast Intertidal Assessment.15 
Figure 3.1.4. Distribution of sampling stations in California for the 2002 West Coast 
Intertidal Assessment.16 
Figure 3.1.5. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers in Puget Sound for 
the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.17 
Figure 3.1.6. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for the outer coastal 
estuaries of Washington for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.18 
Figure 3.1.7. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for the northern half 
of Oregon for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.19 
Figure 3.1.8. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for the southern half 
of Oregon for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.20 
Figure 3.1.9. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for Coos Bay, 
Oregon for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.21 
Figure 3.1.10. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for the northern 
half of California for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.22 
Figure 3.1.11. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for the southern 
half of California for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.23 
Figure 3.1.12. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for Areata and 
Humboldt Bays, California for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.24 
Figure 3.1.13. Distribution of sampling stations with station numbers for San Francisco 
Bay, California for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment.25 
Figure 3.2.1. Percent fine sediments for the 2002 West Coast Intertidal Assessment. 26 
VIII 
