Prsviously only known from Qu66nsla.no.. Our examples agree with 
intner 
account of Richardson's type. The "very numerous up|ulated and irregular 
jr,-r ■ 
. -y sjy- 
■Wtgji.rj*** 
bluish longitudinal lines" have apparently largely fad|i, though there 
?Fr~ 
•i' •• r » 
. -Vc-' - 
•Ilf'/V' 
are still traces of them in some of the specimens 
h* * r,c ^ i 
* "band, across the tasal f fportion of "the cauoax fin 
w 
:\3i 
Likewise the "whitish 
a#" 
W 
o not find the black 
?f|r 
OPp 
spot 
in theAasal region of the last dorftl and anal rays. It is 
in the pale hind border to the pectoral 
■W 
the most striking and 
/SB*? 
g&r 
constant 1 character is found, and this wi|f: distinguish the species most 
:■# .MZ 4 
3 '~ 
■m 
any time. Although greatly different gfthe presence of 31 dorsal and 
28 or 29 anal rays, besides the dohpils and anals without dark 
• -■:< , 
jva&i*. 
. „ -; ,.A • 
longitudinal bands we feel that thJJ species isjpff close to He gat us 
•£&=?■• A-..: 
- 
S : 
V>y\.. 
sohali ( Forskal ), apparently only 
from the Red Sea. 
