INDEX TO THE HISTORIA CONCHYLIORUM. 
21 
Tab. f'ig. 
365. 205. Arca Modiolus. 
3 66. 206. Mytilus exustus; and Petiver, in his Gazophylacium, t. 153. f. 3. has copied this 
fi gure. 
367. 207. Arca imbricata; and Klein’s 1.11. f. 69. and 70. are copies. 
368. 208. Arca Noce; and it has been copied from Buonanni, Ricreatione, part 2. fig. 32. 
369. 209. Is probably an old shell of Arca Noce encrusted with zoophytes. 
370. 210. Pinna muricata. 
371. 212. Pinna saccata. 
372. 213. A variety of Pinna squamosa. 
373. 214. Pinna rudis. 
374. 215. Pinna squamosa. 
375. 216. Donax rugosa; and Klein’s 1.11. f. 61. is a copy. 
376. 217. Donax Trunculus. 
— 218. Donax denticulata. 
— 219. Donax striata. 
377 - 220 . Donax Scortum. 
378. 221. Venus Meroe. 
379 . 222.1 „ • , 
- Donax scripta. 
380. 223.) 
381. 224. Most authors have followed Lister in considering this to be a variety of Donax 
scripta. 
382. 225. Tellina rostrata. Dr. Solander considered the Tellina pallescens of the Descrip¬ 
tive Catalogue to be the Linnean Tellina rostrata, and he has cited the present 
figure for his Tellina elongata. 
383. 226. Tellina angusta; and the species, as it stands in Gmelin, has been wholly taken 
from this figure. 
384. 227. Is Donax complanata; and from this figure the Tellina No. 31. of Schroeters 
Einleitung, and the Tellina variegata of Gmelin, have been wholly derived. 
385. 232. Venus Sarni ensis of Turton. 
386. 233. Tellina Madagascariensis; and the name was first given by Gmelin to a simple 
description of this figure. 
387- 234. Tellina marginalis. 
388. 235. Quoted by Chemnitz, Schroeter, and Gmelin, jointly with t. 406. f. 252. for Tellina 
angulata; and Lister, on the other hand, has expressed a doubt whether it is 
distinet from the preceding figure 234. 
389- 228. Donax plebeia. 
390. 229. The Venus No. 75. of Schroeters Einleitung, and the Venus Virginica of Gmelin, 
have been constituted from this figure; and it is probably nothing more than a 
variety of Tellina fragilis, for which it has been quoted by Dr. Turton. 
391. 230. This figure has been erroneously described by Gmelin as a separate species, with 
the name of Tellina purpurascens; and it is a variety of Donax leevigata, with 
the outer as well as inner surface of an uniform purplish colour. 
392. 231. Donax cuneata. 
393. 240. Tellina radiata. 
394. 241. Tellina Ferroensis; and it is copied from the Appendix to the Historia Anima¬ 
lium Angliae, t. i. f. 8. 
395. 242. Tellina planata. Kleins 1.10. f. 56. is a copy. 
396. 243. Gmelin has followed Schroeter in describing this figure as a separate species, with 
the name of Venus cruentata; and a similar shell, which I have received from 
the Mediterranean, differs principally from Venus Gallina in having the trans¬ 
verse striae more remote. At t. 10. f. 50. of his Methodus Ostracolog. Klein 
has copied this figure. 
397- 236. Solen sanguinolentus. 
398. 237- Tellina pallescens. 
399. 238. Tellina interrupta. Although Gmelin has not quoted Lister, his Tellina aspera 
is taken from the Tellina No. 38. of Schroeter’s Einleitung, and has been en- 
tirely derived from this figure. 
400. 239. Venus undulata. 
401. 244. From this rather uncertain figure the Tellina triangularis of Gmelin has been con- 
F 
