Tab. Fig. 
INDEX TO THE HISTORIA CONCHYLIORUM. 
45 
pp. 3476 and 3498, lias described with the namc of Buccinum ventricosum, the 
former is the Buccinum No. 94. of Schroeters Einleitung, and has been wholly 
constituted from this figure. 
1008. 71- b. Buccinum cornutum. 
1009. 71 • c. A young shell of Buccinum cornutum. 
1010. 71. d. Martini has quoted this figure for Murex trunculus ; but it is badly executed, 
and hardly deserves notice. 
1011. 71. e. Is a variety of Buccinum rugosum; and Lister has copied this figure, although 
not correctly, either from Rondeletius or Aldrovandus. 
— 71. f. Buccinum nodosum. Gmelin has incautiously given the name of Buccinum 
strigosum to three dilferent species, and one of these has been wholly derived 
from this figure. 
1012. 76- A young shell of Buccinum Saburon. 
1013. 77- Quoted by Dr. Solander for his Buccinum Panthera, which he considered to be a 
distinet species; but the intermediate gradations are so numerous, that I greatly 
doubt whether it is more than a variety of Buccinum Erinaceus. 
1014. 78. Buccinum strigatum; and Gmelin, following Schroeter, has erroneously formed a 
separate species from this figure, with the name of Buccinum rugosum. 
1015. 73. Copied by Lister from Buonanni’s Ricreatione, part 3. f. 152. and is the same as 
Martini, f. 363: which is generally considered to be a variety of Buccinum Eri¬ 
naceus, but has been arranged separately by Dr. Solander, with the name of 
Buccinum Meles. 
1016. 74. The Buccinum No. 100. of Schroeters Einleitung, which is the Buccinum ponde¬ 
rosum of Gmelin, has been wholly constituted from this figure; and though not 
well executed, it most probably is nothing more than a variety of Buccinum 
Erinaceus. 
— 73- Buccinum recurvirostrum; and the species was originally constituted by Schroeter 
and Gmelin entirely from this figure. I know of only one other figure, which 
is Perry’s, and it is his Cassidea labiata. 
1017. 79* Murex Aluco; and Petivers Gazophylacium, t. 153. f. 2. is a copy. 
1018. 80. Murex Obeliscus; and Petiver’s Gazophylacium, 1.152. f. 4. is a copy. 
— 81. The Murex No. 71. of Schroeters Einleitung, and the Murex minimus of Gmelin 
are derived entirely from this figure: and it is the Cerithium Zonale of Bru- 
guiere, which is probably the Linnean Trochus striatellus. Petiver has copied 
this figure in his Gazophylacium, 1.152. f. 5. 
1019. 82. Murex alucoides. 
1020. 83. Murex Vertagus; and the engraving has been made from the Ricreatione, part 3. 
f. 84. so as merely to invert Buonannfs figure, and correct its heterostrephous 
appearance. 
— 84. Murex asper. 
1021. 85. Murex sulcatus. 
— 85. b. Is the Cerithium fasciatum of Bruguiere, and the Murex fasciatus of my MS. 
In the Descriptive Catalogue it is arranged as a variety of Murex Vertagus, but 
is distinet; and differs in having the whirls strongly plaited longitudinally 
throughout, and slightly striated as well as striped transversely. 
1022 . 86. Murex maculosus. 
1023. 88. Murex Lampas. 
1024. 89. Strombus tuberculatus. 
— 90. Bruguiere, with a mark of doubt, has quoted this figure for his Cerithium ocella- 
tum, which is a species nearly allied to Strombus tuberculatus. 
— 91. Gmelin, in a note at p. 3562 of the Systema, has placed this among the doubtful 
figures; and it is the Murex No. 74. of Schroeters Einleitung. No other author 
has noticed it except Meuschen, who, with a mark of doubt, has quoted it for 
his Buccinum calebare in the Museum Geversianum, No. 592. 
1025. 87. Murex tuberosus. 
FOSSIL UNIVALVES. 
1027- 1. Ampullaria acuta of Lamarck and Sovverby. 
M 
