Misprints on Plates. 
Annotation. 
Misprints on plates: 
PI. 1 h read adanensis $ instead of adanensis <$. 
PI. 6 a read interpositella instead of interposita. 
PI. 6 f read Intea instead of flava. 
PI. 6 h read psendoliturata $ instead of falloui $>. 
PI. 7 b read nehallenia instead of lewisi. 
PI. 8 b read aboleta instead of obsoleta. 
PI. 10 b read relict ns instead of relicta. 
PI. 10 c read sibiricus instead of sibirica. 
PI. I0g read filipjevi instead of filipjeri. 
f I. 11 e read punctovenalia instead of punctorenalis. 
PI. 14 d read gelukpa instead of gelnpka. 
Id. 14 e read noeturnalis instead of nordlandica. 
PI. 14 f read hoenei instead of hoehnei. 
PI. 15 e read liectica instead of hectina. 
PI. 15 f read suzukii instead of susrnkii. 
PI. 16 f read ducellieri instead of ducillieri. 
PI. 16 i read turkmenica instead of turkmena. 
Annotation: 
1 The illustration of a Noctnid (topsenti) on pi. 15 g (2) was inserted in error. 
vtem 06^4/ wl !rf fr n i° n t' if d ^ ™ ‘; hou ! berti "‘ is without a doubt merely a variety of Kerala macro - 
f , ,5^-’ which has already been figured twice m this work. In Vol. 2, p. 75, the grey form (illustrated 
on p 13 i), was dealt with under the Lithosiinae and mention was made that its classification there appeared 
c%t”unf r w rrr, u r rated * (VoL 3p - 299) ™ der — in the no*™* ith 
J v , f1 ‘ ' illustrated from a specimen from W. China and classified in its correct position on 
telt With the » Vol. 2. The species is no, mentioned 
