Amblyodon dealbatus P. Beauv., Horton-in-Ribblesdale, Yorkshire 
(64), Sept. /07, C.A.C. ; also Aberffraw, Anglesey (52), Aug. /OB, 
J.C.W. 
Meesia trichoides Spruce, Southport, S. Lancs. (59), May /05, H.B. 
Paludellct squctrrosa Brick, Drivdalen, Dovrefjeld, Norway, July /08, 
P.E. 
Philonotis rigida Brick, Glengarriff, co. Cork (3), June /00, leg. 
Pev. C. H. Binsteacl, E.A. 
Philonotis fontana Brick var. amplirctis Dixon, stream on Braeriach 
at 2,400 ft., Easterness (96 :;: ), J.A.W. “This is quite correctly named 
according to the Handbook, but further light derived from the study 
of Dismier’s Monograph on the Philonotis of France led me to name 
the above plant as P. ccespitosa Wils. var. laxa (Warnst.) Lske & Warnst. 
Mr. Dixon, to whom I mentioned the matter some time ago, agrees 
that our var. amplirctis should come under P. ccespitosa as above.” 
W.I. 
Philonotis capillciris Lindb., Blakeshall, Worcs. (37), Nov. /OB, 
J.B.D. 
Orthodontium grcicile Schwaeg., Pocks by Strid, Bolton Abbey, 
Yorkshire (64), Oct. /OB, C.A.C. 
Leptobryum pyriforme Wils. var. minus Husn., Sandhills, Mochras 
near Harlech (48'”), June /04, D.A.J. “ New to Wales.” 
Webera nutans Hedw. var. longiseta B. k S., South Barrule, Isle of 
Man (71”), Aug. /08, leg. Hartley and Wheldon ; var. data Stalle, 
Storeton Quarry, Cheshire (58), Mar. /98, J.A.W. “ Those members 
who received this in the distribution of 1900 may now name it as 
above. See Beport for 1900, p. 53. It occurs also near Rainford 
Junction, S. Lancs. (59).” J.A.W. 
Webera -, Bryansford, co. Down (38”), Oct. /OB, C.H.W. “Is 
W. proligcra Bryhn,” J. A.W. 
Webera Ludwigii Schp., Glacier rivulets, Dovrefjeld, Norway, 
Aug. /89, W.B.W. 
Webera albicans Schp., var. glacialis Schp., Croban, Killin (88), 
Aug. /07, J.B.D. 
Bryum pendulum Schp., var. compactum Schp., Ainsdale, S. Lancs. 
(59*), July /07, and St. Anne’s, W. Lancs. (60”), June 98, J.A.W. 
“The specimens sent are much more extreme than those I have 
received from Continental botanists under this name. If the latter 
are correctly named, this variety is more common than the type on 
our Lancashire sandhills. This var. was accidently omitted from 
Census Cat. for v. c. 59 and 60. It also requires putting on record 
for Cheshire (58”), as it occurs at Wallasey. I have a still more 
reduced and compact form with still smaller capsules which should 
